05/19/2017

New York Times Blames Venezuela’s Collapse On … Trumpism

Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

Let's face it, there's going to be a new, and most likely completely baseless, instance of Trump derangement blaring from the front pages of the New York Times and Washington Post more or less every day for at least the next three and a half years.  It can be amusing to make fun of these things, but at some point the Manhattan Contrarian has to find something better to do.  How about looking into recent reporting on Venezuela?

Based on a tip from a reader, I turned to interior page A4 of Monday's edition of the New York Times, and found there an article on Venezuela, occupying the full page, mostly text, but accompanied by several pictures of empty store shelves and of riot police clashing with demonstrators.  The authors are Max Fisher and Amanda Taub, and the headline is "How Venezuela Has Stumbled to the Brink of Collapse."    

My reader's question was, how is it possible that they could write this mountain of text about the collapse of Venezuela's economy and its causes without even once using the word "socialism"?  And he's right about that -- the word "socialism" doesn't appear a single time.  But it's much  worse than that.  By itself, the omission to mention "socialism" in a discussion of the causes of Venezuela's economic collapse could be attributed to mere ignorance or stupidity.  This article goes far beyond mere ignorance and stupidity, and veers deep into dishonesty and malice.  

The basic idea here is to gin up a narrative to describe the reigns of Chavez and Maduro in Venezuela in terms to tie them to Trumpism, and to make the story of Venezuela into a call to resist Trump.  Don't believe me?  Try a few excerpts:

Distrust of institutions often leads populists, who see themselves as the people’s true champion, to consolidate power. But institutions sometimes resist, leading to tit-for-tat conflicts that can weaken both sides. . . .  

Because populism describes a world divided between the righteous people and the corrupt elite, each round of confrontation, by drawing hard lines between legitimate and illegitimate points of view, can polarize society.  Supporters and opponents of a leader like Mr. Chávez come to see each other as locked in a high-stakes struggle, justifying extreme action. . . .  

Read full article



You May Also Like:

An Honest Comey Interview Kimberley A. Strassel, The Wall Street Journal

Democrats Are Getting Desperate As Mueller Stalls Michael Goodwin, New York Post

The $173 Million IRS Tech Team #Failed Adam Andrzejewski, Forbes.com

Melania Trump Brought Two Special Guests In Honor Of Barbara Bush To Her Funeral Jenni Fink, Independent Journal Review

The Most Dangerous Democrat In America Michael Walsh, PJ Media

Eric Holder For Prison, Not President Daniel John Sobieski, American Thinker

18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictions Made Around The Time Of The First Earth Day In 1970. Expect More This Year. Mark J. Perry, Foundation for Economic Education

Gorsuch Strikes A Blow Against The Administrative State George Will, National Review

The Left’s Latest Creepy, Orwellian Education Tactic Karen Efrem and Jane Robbins, American Spectator

This Is How The Government Will Spend Your Taxes In 2018 Brian Riedl, New York Post

Visualizing The Pension Time Bomb: $400 Trillion By 2050 Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

In Defense Of Cash William J. Luther, Reason

#BoycottYeti Movement Erupts After Cooler Maker Ditches NRA Foundation AWR Hawkins, Breitbart News

Hammer Time: Author Brad Thor Vows 2020 Challenge To Trump Sarah Rumpf, RedState

Newly Revealed Government Statistics Hidden From Public Dismantle Liberal Gun Control Narrative Chris Enloe, TheBlaze

Chappaquiddick Rescues The Truth: Kopechne Needn’t Have Died Nathaniel Peters, Library of Law and Liberty

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central March Year-to-Year: 2.21% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section