05/19/2017

New York Times Blames Venezuela’s Collapse On … Trumpism

Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

Let's face it, there's going to be a new, and most likely completely baseless, instance of Trump derangement blaring from the front pages of the New York Times and Washington Post more or less every day for at least the next three and a half years.  It can be amusing to make fun of these things, but at some point the Manhattan Contrarian has to find something better to do.  How about looking into recent reporting on Venezuela?

Based on a tip from a reader, I turned to interior page A4 of Monday's edition of the New York Times, and found there an article on Venezuela, occupying the full page, mostly text, but accompanied by several pictures of empty store shelves and of riot police clashing with demonstrators.  The authors are Max Fisher and Amanda Taub, and the headline is "How Venezuela Has Stumbled to the Brink of Collapse."    

My reader's question was, how is it possible that they could write this mountain of text about the collapse of Venezuela's economy and its causes without even once using the word "socialism"?  And he's right about that -- the word "socialism" doesn't appear a single time.  But it's much  worse than that.  By itself, the omission to mention "socialism" in a discussion of the causes of Venezuela's economic collapse could be attributed to mere ignorance or stupidity.  This article goes far beyond mere ignorance and stupidity, and veers deep into dishonesty and malice.  

The basic idea here is to gin up a narrative to describe the reigns of Chavez and Maduro in Venezuela in terms to tie them to Trumpism, and to make the story of Venezuela into a call to resist Trump.  Don't believe me?  Try a few excerpts:

Distrust of institutions often leads populists, who see themselves as the people’s true champion, to consolidate power. But institutions sometimes resist, leading to tit-for-tat conflicts that can weaken both sides. . . .  

Because populism describes a world divided between the righteous people and the corrupt elite, each round of confrontation, by drawing hard lines between legitimate and illegitimate points of view, can polarize society.  Supporters and opponents of a leader like Mr. Chávez come to see each other as locked in a high-stakes struggle, justifying extreme action. . . .  

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Charles Krauthammer, Conservative Commentator And Pulitzer Prize Winner, Dead At 68 [Watch] Elizabeth Llorent, Fox News

The Example Of Charles Krauthammer Peter Wehner, The New York Times

I Grew Up On Charles Krauthammer Ben Shapiro, The Daily Wire

Charles Krauthammer, A Great Thinker And An Even Better Friend Irwin Stelzer, The Wall Street Journal

Survey: Most Voters Blame Parents Of Separated Kids, Not The Federal Govt For Current Border Crisis Kemberlee Kaye, Legal Insurrection

Obama Criticizes Trump For Family Separation, But Ignores Own Record Of Separating Families Charlie Spiering, Breitbart

The Kochtopus Crushes Nashville Transit Kyle Smith, National Review

Supreme Court Rules States Can Require Online Sellers To Collect Sales Tax Lydia Wheeler And Naomi Jagoda, The Hill

Trump’s Critics Desecrate The Holocaust Jay Winik, The Wall Street Journal

Here’s How Trump Wants To Streamline Government Fred Lucas, The Daily Signal

Illegal Immigration, Internment Camps, And Useful Idiots David Catron, The American Spectator

A Screaming Rabid Radical, Employed By The Department Of Justice Monica Showalter, American Thinker

The Folly Of Multiculturalism Raymond Ibrahim, PJ Media

DC Has More Psychopaths Than Any Other Place In Country, Study Finds Circa News

Starbucks Burned By Social-Justice Appeasement As Growth Stalls, Stock Plunges Valerie Richardson, The Washington Times

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central May Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section