04/21/2017

Why Politicians Win (And Workers Lose) Under Socialism

Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Mises Institute

Socialism leads to the politicization of society. Hardly anything can be worse for the production of wealth.

Socialism, at least its Marxist version, says its goal is complete equality. The Marxists observe that once you allow private property in the means of production, you allow differences. If I own resource A, then you do not own it and our relationship toward resource A becomes different and unequal. By abolishing private property in the means of production with one stroke, say the Marxists, everyone becomes co-owner of everything. This reflects everyone's equal standing as a human being.

The reality is much different. Declaring everyone a co-owner of everything only nominally solves differences in ownership. It does not solve the real underlying problem:  there remain differences in the power to control what is done with resources.

In capitalism, the person who owns a resource can also control what is done with it. In a socialized economy, this isn't true because there is no longer any owner. Nonetheless the problem of control remains. Who is going to decide what is to be done with what? Under socialism, there is only one way: people settle their disagreements over the control of property by superimposing one will upon another. As long as there are differences, people will settle them through political means.

If people want to improve their income under socialism they have to move toward a more highly valued position in the hierarchy of caretakers. That takes political talent.

Under such a system, people will have to spend less time and effort developing their productive skills and more time and effort improving their political talents.

As people shift out of their roles as producers and users of resources, we find that their personalities change. They no longer cultivate the ability to anticipate situations of scarcity to take up productive opportunities, to be aware of technological possibilities, to anticipate changes in consumer demand, and to develop strategies of marketing. They no longer have to be able to initiate, to work, and to respond to the needs of others.

Instead, people develop the ability to assemble public support for their own position and opinion through means of persuasion, demagoguery, and intrigue, through promises, bribes, and threats. Different people rise to the top under socialism than under capitalism. The higher on the socialist hierarchy you look, the more you will find people who are too incompetent to do the job they are supposed to do. It is no hindrance in a caretaker politician's career to be dumb, indolent, inefficient, and uncaring. He only needs superior political skills. This too contributes to the impoverishment of society.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The French Election: We May Have Avoided A Political And Economic Cataclysm Steve Forbes, Forbes.com

Fox News To Become More Like Despised Competitor [Watch] Art Moore, WND

GOP Border Tax Will Build A Wall Around Consumers Matthew Kandrach, RealClearPolitics

Thanks To Democrats, Pre-Existing Conditions Outweigh The Uninsured In The GOP Obamacare Deal [Watch] Avik Roy, Forbes.com

Judge Jeanine: 'Time To Fight Back' Against ‘Snowflakes’ Trampling On Free Speech [Watch] Fox News

France Will Now Choose Between Two Outsiders, Macron And Le Pen John Fund, National Review

No 2018 Landslide? Trump And GOP See Polls Improve, While Dems Sink Ryan Girdusky, Red Alert Politics

Ann Coulter’s Important Lesson: Appeasement Always Fails Derek Hunter, Townhall

Berkeley Antifa Activist Who Beat Trump Supporter With Bike Lock Identified As ‘Ethics’ Professor [Watch] Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit

This May Be Venezuela’s Tiananmen Square Moment [Watch] Ana Quintana, Daily Signal

ABC/Wapo Poll: 98 Percent Of Trump Voters Happy With Their Choice Cathy Burke, Newsmax

President Trump Marks First Visit To Walter Reed By Hand-Delivering Purple Heart To Wounded Vet [Watch] Virginia Kruta, Independent Journal Review

No, Gov. Dean, There Is No ‘Hate Speech’ Exception To The First Amendment Eugene Volokh, Washington Post

Bill Nye Blows Gasket When A Real Scientist Schools Him On Facts About ‘Climate Change’ [Watch] Chris Enloe, The Blaze

How Africa Got Left Behind Marian L. Tupy, Foundation for Economic Education

Socialist Death Squads Rule Venezuela John Hinderaker, Powerline Blog

13 Most Ridiculous Predictions Made On Earth Day, 1970 Jon Gabriel, Ricochet

Democrats File Federal Lawsuit To Try To Steal The Georgia Special Election Erick Erickson, The Resurgent

Visualizing The Collapse Of The Middle Class In 20 Major U.S. Cities Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge

Chelsea Clinton: Little Creep Kevin D. Williamson, National Review

Bottling Up Free Trade: Challenging MN’s Bad Wine Laws [Watch] Institute for Justice

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

SHARE

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature



Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

SHARE

Keynesian Economics and the Great Depression

Hillsdale College economics professor Gary Wolfram discusses Keynesian economics and the factors that pulled the national economy out of the Great Depression. The story of World War II shows that government spending may produce activity, but not the prosperity of a truly healthy economy.

 

-- Gary Wolfram, Hillsdale College,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    BLS: 4.5%
    Shadow Stats: 22.5%
  • Inflation:
    March Year-to-Year: 2.74% (CPI-U*)
    Shadow Stats: 10.5%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]