04/21/2017

Why Politicians Win (And Workers Lose) Under Socialism

Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Mises Institute

Socialism leads to the politicization of society. Hardly anything can be worse for the production of wealth.

Socialism, at least its Marxist version, says its goal is complete equality. The Marxists observe that once you allow private property in the means of production, you allow differences. If I own resource A, then you do not own it and our relationship toward resource A becomes different and unequal. By abolishing private property in the means of production with one stroke, say the Marxists, everyone becomes co-owner of everything. This reflects everyone's equal standing as a human being.

The reality is much different. Declaring everyone a co-owner of everything only nominally solves differences in ownership. It does not solve the real underlying problem:  there remain differences in the power to control what is done with resources.

In capitalism, the person who owns a resource can also control what is done with it. In a socialized economy, this isn't true because there is no longer any owner. Nonetheless the problem of control remains. Who is going to decide what is to be done with what? Under socialism, there is only one way: people settle their disagreements over the control of property by superimposing one will upon another. As long as there are differences, people will settle them through political means.

If people want to improve their income under socialism they have to move toward a more highly valued position in the hierarchy of caretakers. That takes political talent.

Under such a system, people will have to spend less time and effort developing their productive skills and more time and effort improving their political talents.

As people shift out of their roles as producers and users of resources, we find that their personalities change. They no longer cultivate the ability to anticipate situations of scarcity to take up productive opportunities, to be aware of technological possibilities, to anticipate changes in consumer demand, and to develop strategies of marketing. They no longer have to be able to initiate, to work, and to respond to the needs of others.

Instead, people develop the ability to assemble public support for their own position and opinion through means of persuasion, demagoguery, and intrigue, through promises, bribes, and threats. Different people rise to the top under socialism than under capitalism. The higher on the socialist hierarchy you look, the more you will find people who are too incompetent to do the job they are supposed to do. It is no hindrance in a caretaker politician's career to be dumb, indolent, inefficient, and uncaring. He only needs superior political skills. This too contributes to the impoverishment of society.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Remember That California Single Payer Plan? Yeah… Never Mind. Jazz Shaw, Hot Air

The Missing Ingredient In The Senate’s Obamacare Replacement Sen. Mike Lee, Medium

The Banana Republic Of Illinois Stephen Moore, Investor’s Business Daily

How Obama’s Liberalism Paved The Way For Donald Trump Michael Goodwin, New York Post

Amazon: Anti-Trust Target? [Watch] The Wall Street Journal

Bernie Sanders And His Wife Are Being Investigated By The FBI — Now They’re Lawyering Up Chris Enloe, The Blaze

Liberal Media Livid Over Mattis’ Approach To ISIS: We’re Going to Kill Them All Young Conservatives

Civil Asset Forfeiture: Where Due Process Goes To Die Kevin D. Williamson, National Review

Mystified’: Morning Joe’s Bizarre Music Video Leaves Viewers Speechless [Watch] Jason Miko, Media Equalizer

Democrats, FBI Collaborated On Trump Smear John Hinderaker, Powerline

Trump Derangement Syndrome Has Become The New Plague Roger L. Simon, PJ Media

Record Label Drops Band Over Its ‘Ugly Opinions’ On Safe Spaces, Feminism And Immigration Jillian Kay Melchior, Heat Street

Arsonist Behind Des Moines Mosque Fire Turns Out To Be... Muslim Mark Tapson, Truth Revolt

The Koch Brothers Are Coming After Bad Federal Workers [Watch] Pete Kasperowicz, Washington Examiner

Why The Unlikely Duo Of Adam Carolla And Dennis Prager Are Making A Movie R. J. Moeller, Acculturated

Maxine Waters Bars Trump Supporters From Town Hall Meeting [Watch] Kyle Olson, American Mirror

How The Government Conditions Citizens To Obey Joe Jarvis, The Daily Bell

‘Free’ College Is A Bad Idea For Britain And A Bad Idea For Us Logan Albright, Conservative Review

If We Want "Unity," Government Must Become Weaker Ryan McMaken, Mises Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.3%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.0%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central May Year-to-Year: 1.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.6%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]