04/21/2017

Why Politicians Win (And Workers Lose) Under Socialism

Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Mises Institute

Socialism leads to the politicization of society. Hardly anything can be worse for the production of wealth.

Socialism, at least its Marxist version, says its goal is complete equality. The Marxists observe that once you allow private property in the means of production, you allow differences. If I own resource A, then you do not own it and our relationship toward resource A becomes different and unequal. By abolishing private property in the means of production with one stroke, say the Marxists, everyone becomes co-owner of everything. This reflects everyone's equal standing as a human being.

The reality is much different. Declaring everyone a co-owner of everything only nominally solves differences in ownership. It does not solve the real underlying problem:  there remain differences in the power to control what is done with resources.

In capitalism, the person who owns a resource can also control what is done with it. In a socialized economy, this isn't true because there is no longer any owner. Nonetheless the problem of control remains. Who is going to decide what is to be done with what? Under socialism, there is only one way: people settle their disagreements over the control of property by superimposing one will upon another. As long as there are differences, people will settle them through political means.

If people want to improve their income under socialism they have to move toward a more highly valued position in the hierarchy of caretakers. That takes political talent.

Under such a system, people will have to spend less time and effort developing their productive skills and more time and effort improving their political talents.

As people shift out of their roles as producers and users of resources, we find that their personalities change. They no longer cultivate the ability to anticipate situations of scarcity to take up productive opportunities, to be aware of technological possibilities, to anticipate changes in consumer demand, and to develop strategies of marketing. They no longer have to be able to initiate, to work, and to respond to the needs of others.

Instead, people develop the ability to assemble public support for their own position and opinion through means of persuasion, demagoguery, and intrigue, through promises, bribes, and threats. Different people rise to the top under socialism than under capitalism. The higher on the socialist hierarchy you look, the more you will find people who are too incompetent to do the job they are supposed to do. It is no hindrance in a caretaker politician's career to be dumb, indolent, inefficient, and uncaring. He only needs superior political skills. This too contributes to the impoverishment of society.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Here’s To Another Year Of American Hilarity George Will, National Review

'Black Friday' Entertainingly Mocks A Confused Federal Reserve John Tamny, RealClearMarkets

ObamaCare’s Death Payments The Wall Street Journal

Michael Flynn Made A Move That Indicates He May Soon Cooperate With The Mueller Probe David Choi, Business Insider

Trumps Spend Thanksgiving Serving Meals To Active Duty Armed Forces Benny Johnson, Daily Caller

Why, Exactly, Are Democrats Opposed To Trump's Tax Reform Bill? Weekly Standard

Fusion GPS Paid Journalists, Court Papers Confirm Todd Shepherd, Washington Examiner

How Free Trade Helps Americans Have Higher Incomes And More Jobs Patrick Tyrrell, Daily Signal

Seattle's Income Tax On 'The Rich' Has Collateral Damage: The Poor Brian T. Hodges, American Thinker

Is Health Care A Human Right? Trevor Burrus, Foundation for Economic Education

I Got Fired For Calling Out Liberal Hypocrisy On Clinton Accusers Larry Elder, RealClearPolitics

NFL Ratings Slide Is Getting Worse, With No End In Sight Warner Todd Huston, Breitbart

Sarah Silverman: I ‘Fell In Love’ With Trump Voters While Traveling Across Country Andrew Mark Miller, American News

The Administrative State Under Siege Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

How Grocery Stores Got Good Steven Horwitz, Reason

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

When America Was Truly The Land Of Opportunity

For [early immigrants] America was truly the land of opportunity. For the first time in their lives, many were truly free to pursue their own objectives. That freedom released the human energies which created the United States. There were few government programs to turn to and nobody expected them. But also there were few rules and regulations. There were no licenses, no permits, no red tape to restrict them. They found, in fact, a free market, and most of them thrived on it. 

-- Milton Friedman,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.1%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.6%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central October Year-to-Year: 2.23% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]