04/21/2017

The Democrats Lose Their S—

Ben Shapiro, Investor’s Business Daily

Donald Trump won the presidency because he was seen as blunt and non-manipulative, as opposed to the robotic, incompetent Machiavellianism of Hillary Clinton — and because he demonstrated that he cared about the concerns of Americans who were sick of being called racist sexist bigot homophobes for not paying obeisance to the leftist cause du jour.

Democrats apparently think he won because he said the word "s---."

On Wednesday, the Democratic Party got into a Twitter war with the Republican Party. The GOP tweeted out a picture of a shirt sold by the Dem rats that says "Democrats give a sh*t about people." This is a takeoff on Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez's statements that Republicans don't give a s--- about people. Republicans responded to the shirt by tweeting: "2016: 'When they go low, we go high' — Michelle Obama." The Democratic Party responded, "Taking away health care from 24 million people is going low. Giving a s--- about people is going high."

The theory here seems to be that repeating the same Democratic message but with a higher pitch and more vulgar language will win them political favor again. It wasn't Trump's rejection of leftism that won him acolytes; it was that he dropped the S-word and the F-word and the P-word. If only Democrats could imitate his style — all would be well!

This is asinine.

Cursing didn't hurt Trump because Trump was running against type. His cursing demonstrated that he wasn't a conservative fuddy-duddy who was deeply concerned about policing language. He channeled the anger of his base.

Democratic cursing just demonstrates, as always, that Democrats have no standards with regard to speech. It's not violating a taboo to say s--- as a Democrat because there is no taboo. And simply saying that word over and over doesn't help Democrats who are still struggling for a national message.

Democrats are in trouble nationwide because they have strayed from their core pitch: caring about every American. Instead, they have decided to embrace the intersectional nonsense of Barack Obama, who divvied Americans up along race, class, sex and sexual orientation lines and then pandered to each group individually.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Remember That California Single Payer Plan? Yeah… Never Mind. Jazz Shaw, Hot Air

The Missing Ingredient In The Senate’s Obamacare Replacement Sen. Mike Lee, Medium

The Banana Republic Of Illinois Stephen Moore, Investor’s Business Daily

How Obama’s Liberalism Paved The Way For Donald Trump Michael Goodwin, New York Post

Amazon: Anti-Trust Target? [Watch] The Wall Street Journal

Bernie Sanders And His Wife Are Being Investigated By The FBI — Now They’re Lawyering Up Chris Enloe, The Blaze

Liberal Media Livid Over Mattis’ Approach To ISIS: We’re Going to Kill Them All Young Conservatives

Civil Asset Forfeiture: Where Due Process Goes To Die Kevin D. Williamson, National Review

Mystified’: Morning Joe’s Bizarre Music Video Leaves Viewers Speechless [Watch] Jason Miko, Media Equalizer

Democrats, FBI Collaborated On Trump Smear John Hinderaker, Powerline

Trump Derangement Syndrome Has Become The New Plague Roger L. Simon, PJ Media

Record Label Drops Band Over Its ‘Ugly Opinions’ On Safe Spaces, Feminism And Immigration Jillian Kay Melchior, Heat Street

Arsonist Behind Des Moines Mosque Fire Turns Out To Be... Muslim Mark Tapson, Truth Revolt

The Koch Brothers Are Coming After Bad Federal Workers [Watch] Pete Kasperowicz, Washington Examiner

Why The Unlikely Duo Of Adam Carolla And Dennis Prager Are Making A Movie R. J. Moeller, Acculturated

Maxine Waters Bars Trump Supporters From Town Hall Meeting [Watch] Kyle Olson, American Mirror

How The Government Conditions Citizens To Obey Joe Jarvis, The Daily Bell

‘Free’ College Is A Bad Idea For Britain And A Bad Idea For Us Logan Albright, Conservative Review

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.3%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.0%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central May Year-to-Year: 1.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.6%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]