04/21/2017

How To Read This Year’s Special Elections

Michael Barone, Wall Street Journal

Special elections are, well, special. Unlike Senate vacancies, which can be filled by appointment, empty House seats require elections under terms and conditions set by state governments. These contests can provide a barometer of public opinion between regular House elections, and sometimes they have major political reverberations.

The most consequential special election in American history was probably the November 1931 contest to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Texas Republican Henry M. Wurzbach. The victory of Richard M. Kleberg in Texas’ 14th Congressional District turned control of the House to the Democrats. More significant was the staffer that Kleberg hired, a lanky 23-year-old Hill Country schoolteacher named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

In second place was the February 1974 election in Michigan’s Fifth District, held to replace Gerald Ford after his elevation to the vice presidency. The surprise winner was Grand Rapids lawyer Richard Vander Veen. This Democratic victory, in a district that had not elected a Democrat since 1910, signaled that Richard Nixon’s political days were done. Impeachment hearings followed and Nixon resigned six months later.

Special elections in the U.S. are derived from “by-elections” to fill vacancies in the British House of Commons. These go back a long time. My favorite was the January 1667 by-election in the county of Devon, in which the 13-year-old Christopher Monck ran unopposed. It helped that he was the son of the Duke of Albemarle, the general who had restored King Charles II to the throne seven years before. Monck spoke and voted in the House, but his political career was curtailed when his father died and he was elevated to the House of Lords, where he couldn’t vote until he turned 21.

British by-elections continue to be important. The prime minister, under the unwritten British constitution, has powers which in American eyes look dictatorial: She has a seemingly automatic majority for anything. If the opposition captures governing party seats in by-elections, it can restrain No. 10 Downing Street—or even incite panic.

Government takeovers of opposition seats are very rare. This February the Conservatives won a seat in Copeland held by Labour since 1935. The success there might have played a role in Prime Minister Theresa May’s decision to call a general election for June 8. The results will show whether Copeland was a good leading indicator.

American special elections aren’t always predictive. The race to fill Ford’s seat was a harbinger, as were another four that year. Two decades later, in May 1994, Republican victories in Kentucky and Ohio preceded the wave election that brought Republicans their first House majority in 40 years. But there weren’t similar victories that pointed to the Democrats’ big takeover in 2006.

This season’s special elections will primarily replace Trump administration appointees, which means they’re in districts that have been electing Republicans. In the past two decades of partisan polarization and stability, the benchmark to judge the results was obvious: The district’s vote in the last presidential election. But it’s a bit more complicated now.

[Subscription required.]

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Anatomy of a Deep State Kimberley A. Strassel, Wall Street Journal

GOP Holds On To Win Montana House Seat Ben Kamisar, The Hill

Explosive Revelation Of Obama Administration Illegal Surveillance Of Americans Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review

Gowdy: Surveillance Programs Won’t Be Reauthorized Until ‘Unmasking’ Questions Are Answered Nickarama, Young Conservatives

Constitutional Violations By Obama’s NSA Ignored By ‘Big Three’ Broadcast Networks Nicholas Fondacaro, mrcNewsBusters.org

Obama Bashes Trump While Both Are In Europe [Watch] Keith Koffler, White House Dossier

Where Is The Democrats' Plan To Fix ObamaCare? Investor’s Business Daily

Losing Faith In Free Trade Will Make Americans Poorer Ramesh Ponnuru, American Enterprise Institute

A Look At The 66 Federal Programs Trump Wants Gone In 2018 Budget Proposal Andrew Moran, Economic Collapse News

Trump’s Tax Breaks Are Not A ‘Gift' For The Rich Raheem Williams, Intellectual Takeout

Chelsea Clinton: Climate Change Connected To .... Child Marriage [Watch] PJ Media

Fact Check: No, The Republican Healthcare Bill Would Not Cause 23 Million People To 'Lose' Insurance Guy Benson, Townhall

I Grew Up In Chavez’s Socialist Venezuela. Here’s What I Think About The Current Crisis. Ricardo Pita, Daily Signal

Al Franken: ‘I Hate Ted Cruz.’ That’s Okay. Here Are 5 Reasons To Hate Al Franken. [Watch] Robert Kraychik, Daily Wire

BuzzFeed News Reporter Is On Crusade To Kill Hannity’s Sponsors And Gets One Right Scoop

Anarchists Deface Confederate Monuments — Claim ‘Contracted’ By New Orleans Mayor Victor Skinner, American Mirror

Berkeley Antifa Professor Who Beat Trump Supporter With Bike Lock Arrested [Watch] Ian Miles Cheong, Heat Street

Students Threaten, Demand Resignation Of Prof For Questioning “No Whites Allowed” Diversity Event Justin Caruso and Anthony Gockowski, Campus Reform

Thirteen Other Reasons Why Schools Are Creating A Lost Generation Peter Diekmeyer, Foundation for Economic Education

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.4%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.1%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]