04/21/2017

How To Read This Year’s Special Elections

Michael Barone, Wall Street Journal

Special elections are, well, special. Unlike Senate vacancies, which can be filled by appointment, empty House seats require elections under terms and conditions set by state governments. These contests can provide a barometer of public opinion between regular House elections, and sometimes they have major political reverberations.

The most consequential special election in American history was probably the November 1931 contest to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Texas Republican Henry M. Wurzbach. The victory of Richard M. Kleberg in Texas’ 14th Congressional District turned control of the House to the Democrats. More significant was the staffer that Kleberg hired, a lanky 23-year-old Hill Country schoolteacher named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

In second place was the February 1974 election in Michigan’s Fifth District, held to replace Gerald Ford after his elevation to the vice presidency. The surprise winner was Grand Rapids lawyer Richard Vander Veen. This Democratic victory, in a district that had not elected a Democrat since 1910, signaled that Richard Nixon’s political days were done. Impeachment hearings followed and Nixon resigned six months later.

Special elections in the U.S. are derived from “by-elections” to fill vacancies in the British House of Commons. These go back a long time. My favorite was the January 1667 by-election in the county of Devon, in which the 13-year-old Christopher Monck ran unopposed. It helped that he was the son of the Duke of Albemarle, the general who had restored King Charles II to the throne seven years before. Monck spoke and voted in the House, but his political career was curtailed when his father died and he was elevated to the House of Lords, where he couldn’t vote until he turned 21.

British by-elections continue to be important. The prime minister, under the unwritten British constitution, has powers which in American eyes look dictatorial: She has a seemingly automatic majority for anything. If the opposition captures governing party seats in by-elections, it can restrain No. 10 Downing Street—or even incite panic.

Government takeovers of opposition seats are very rare. This February the Conservatives won a seat in Copeland held by Labour since 1935. The success there might have played a role in Prime Minister Theresa May’s decision to call a general election for June 8. The results will show whether Copeland was a good leading indicator.

American special elections aren’t always predictive. The race to fill Ford’s seat was a harbinger, as were another four that year. Two decades later, in May 1994, Republican victories in Kentucky and Ohio preceded the wave election that brought Republicans their first House majority in 40 years. But there weren’t similar victories that pointed to the Democrats’ big takeover in 2006.

This season’s special elections will primarily replace Trump administration appointees, which means they’re in districts that have been electing Republicans. In the past two decades of partisan polarization and stability, the benchmark to judge the results was obvious: The district’s vote in the last presidential election. But it’s a bit more complicated now.

[Subscription required.]

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Here’s To Another Year Of American Hilarity George Will, National Review

'Black Friday' Entertainingly Mocks A Confused Federal Reserve John Tamny, RealClearMarkets

ObamaCare’s Death Payments The Wall Street Journal

Michael Flynn Made A Move That Indicates He May Soon Cooperate With The Mueller Probe David Choi, Business Insider

Trumps Spend Thanksgiving Serving Meals To Active Duty Armed Forces Benny Johnson, Daily Caller

Why, Exactly, Are Democrats Opposed To Trump's Tax Reform Bill? Weekly Standard

Fusion GPS Paid Journalists, Court Papers Confirm Todd Shepherd, Washington Examiner

How Free Trade Helps Americans Have Higher Incomes And More Jobs Patrick Tyrrell, Daily Signal

Seattle's Income Tax On 'The Rich' Has Collateral Damage: The Poor Brian T. Hodges, American Thinker

Is Health Care A Human Right? Trevor Burrus, Foundation for Economic Education

I Got Fired For Calling Out Liberal Hypocrisy On Clinton Accusers Larry Elder, RealClearPolitics

NFL Ratings Slide Is Getting Worse, With No End In Sight Warner Todd Huston, Breitbart

Sarah Silverman: I ‘Fell In Love’ With Trump Voters While Traveling Across Country Andrew Mark Miller, American News

The Administrative State Under Siege Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

How Grocery Stores Got Good Steven Horwitz, Reason

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

When America Was Truly The Land Of Opportunity

For [early immigrants] America was truly the land of opportunity. For the first time in their lives, many were truly free to pursue their own objectives. That freedom released the human energies which created the United States. There were few government programs to turn to and nobody expected them. But also there were few rules and regulations. There were no licenses, no permits, no red tape to restrict them. They found, in fact, a free market, and most of them thrived on it. 

-- Milton Friedman,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.1%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.6%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central October Year-to-Year: 2.23% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]