04/20/2017

The Argument For Abolishing Withholding Taxes

Terrence P. Jeffrey, CNSnews.com

My father, who was born in 1922 and lived his teens and early twenties during the unfortunate reign of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whimsically embraced a tax reform plan that he sardonically explained to me once or twice during his hard-working life.

The first step in this plan was to abolish the federal system of withholding taxes from a worker's paycheck — a system enacted in 1943 by Roosevelt and a Democratic Congress.

FDR wanted not only to limit the size of an individual's income, but also to seize a large share of it before the individual could lay his own hands on it.

About five months after Pearl Harbor, he sent a message to Congress calling for confiscation of what he called "excess income."

"Discrepancies between low personal incomes and very high personal incomes should be lessened," Roosevelt said, "and I therefore believe that in time of this grave national danger, when all excess income should go to win the war, no American citizen ought to have a net income, after he has paid his taxes, of more than $25,000 a year."

In his budget message to Congress the following January, FDR called for what he described as a "pay-as-you-go" tax system. This did not mean the government would only spend as much as it brought in through taxes each year. It meant that employers would be required to pay a worker's federal taxes directly to the government rather than paying a worker the entirety of his earnings and letting him or her deal with the government about how much the government was entitled to take.

FDR pitched his "pay-as-you-go" plan as a way to "simplify" the tax system.

"It is more important than ever before to simplify taxation both for taxpayers and for those collecting the tax, and to put our taxes as far as feasible on a pay-as-you-go basis," he said in his January 1943 budget message.

The Democrat Congress gave FDR this power over private-sector paychecks in the Current Tax Payment Act.

Two years later, World War II ended. But ever since then, through war and peace, employers have paid part of their workers' earnings directly to the federal government rather than to the workers themselves.

The second part of the whimsical plan my father embraced — after ending withholding — was to require workers go to two windows every payday.

The first, as I recall, would be at their employer. Here, they would receive their pay in cash. The second would be at a government office. Here, they would wait in line — just as they would at the DMV — to pay, in cash, the taxes the government claimed they owed.

All deception would be removed from this system: Taxpayers would know exactly what they were getting paid and exactly what they were paying the government.

I believe the rationale for the plan was this: When workers saw how much the government was seizing from their earnings, they would become conservatives and never again elect a president like Roosevelt or a Congress like the one that gave Roosevelt the withholding tax.

The size of the government would shrink. America would remain a nation of free and self-sufficient people.

There may never have been any real chance of enacting the pay-in-cash-on-payday plan, but, as time goes forward, the odds that such a plan would have the desired effect have grown progressively smaller.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The Alleged Kushner–Kislyak Meeting: Amateur Hour May Be Worse Than ‘Collusion’ Andrew C. McCathy, National Review

The Ivanka Entitlement Wall Street Journal

The Willful Murder Of Fox News [Watch] Dick Morris Reports

JFK's Surpassing Legacy: Economic Growth Brian Domitrovic, Forbes.com

Left-Wing Media Outlet Attacks Marines On Memorial Day Over ‘Toxic Masculinity’ Charlie Nash, Breitbart News

State High-Risk Pools For Health Insurance Could Play An Important Role After Obamacare Repeal Matthew Glans, Heartland Institute

Political Prisoner Freed Thanks To Trump Is Hoping He’ll Save Others Jackson Diehl, New York Post

Europe Fights Back With Candles And Teddy Bears Giulio Meotti, Gatestone Institute

Meet The Native American Indian Tribe That Helped Deliver Victory To Donald Trump [Watch] Daniel Allott, Washington Examiner

McCain Says Russia Poses Bigger Threat Than ISIS [Watch] Nick Givas, Daily Caller

In 3 Charts, The Biggest Revelations From New Obamacare Study Rachel del Guidice, Daily Signal

Liberals Teach Their Kids To Hate People Who Don't Think Like Them Joseph Curl, Daily Wire

Speaking With Health Care Policy Expert Avik Roy, Part III [Watch] Frank Camp, The Daily Wire

WSJ’s Strassel Destroys Stacked Anti-Trump Panel On ‘Meet The Press’ With Facts [Watch] Nicholas Fondacaro, mrcNewsBusters.org

Body-Slammed Reporter Fantasized About Punching Conservative Teenagers Ryan Girdusky, Red Alert Politics

Charity For The Homeless Refuses Federal Aid, Gets Hundreds Back On Their Feet [Watch] Kelsey Harkness, Foundation for Economic Education

I’m Not A Terrible Person, I Just Believe In Liberty Marianne March, Intellectual Takeout

Liberal Boycott Of Sean Hannity Backfires And Puts Multiple MSNBC Stars In Crosshairs Chris Enloe, TheBlaze

What About Health Insurance For The Poor? Learn Liberty

Liberals Are Shocked To Find We’re Starting To Hate Them Right Back Kurt Schlichter, Townhall

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.4%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.1%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]