04/18/2017

The Only Way Trump's Washington Can Be Smaller In Four Years

Clyde Wayne Crews Jr., Forbes.com

There are now several moving and overlapping parts to President Donald Trump's streamlining, swamp-draining, "deconstruction of the administrative state” agenda.

Last week brought Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney's memorandum for agency bosses on a "Comprehensive Plan for Reforming the Federal Government and Reducing the Federal Civilian Workforce." They'll have to report back in 180 days on streamlining, with public input.

Overlapping programs were highlighted, such as dozens of federal job programs but no one running the show. Mulvaney calls much agency activity, “costly solutions in search pf a problem”:

The result has been too many overlapping and outdated programs, rules, and processes, and too many Federal employees stuck in a system that is not working for the American people.

Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney takes questions from reporters during a briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House March 16, 2017 (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images).

Overlap isn’t the real issue. It’s the existence of most programs and agencies, period. What is it exactly that agencies are doing? What are they there for? The premises of the supervisory state are the issue.

If we were starting with a blank sheet of paper, we may not keep most federal agencies.

Of course we did start with a blank sheet of paper at the Founding, and they didn’t create all these programs.

Larry Arnn of Hillsdale College noted the 12 Cabinet departments added to the original Secretaries of State and War. Somehow, we had houses before HUD, and we learned before the Education Department appeared on the scene.

Yet here we are. Are such agencies to be merely "lean, accountable, more efficient" rather than gone?

The founders didn't seek to control us back then, yet our complex society is even harder, not easier, to supervise centrally.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Democrats Had No Business Winning In Alabama John Podhoretz, New York Post

Republicans Have A Final Deal On Their Tax Bill — Here's What's In It Bob Bryan, Business Insider

Steve Bannon's Big Loss In Alabama Roger L. Simon, PJ Media

‘We Can’t Take That Risk’ — FBI Officials Discussed ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump Presidency Chuck Ross, Daily Caller

Report: Wait Times For Canada Gov. Health Care 128% Higher Than In ‘93 Bacchus Barua, Fraser Institute

The Left's 'Reverse Robin Hood' Tax Reform Narrative Is Bunk Bernie Marcus, The Hill

Illinois Drives People Away The Wall Street Journal

Double Standards And Distortions Heather Mac Donald, City Journal

Pete King Blasts ‘Disheveled Drunk’ Steve Bannon Bob Fredericks, New York Post

Report: Lawyer Caught Offering Woman $200,000 To Accuse Trump Of Sex Assault V. Saxena, Conservative Tribune

Government Should Leave Bakers Alone Ron Paul, Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

100 Years. 100 Million Lives. Think Twice. Laura M. Nicolae, Harvard Crimson

Liberate Food Trucks [Watch] John Stossel, Townhall

While Everyone Was Distracted By Alabama Election, Senate Passed Tight Vote To Give Trump A Huge Victory Warner Todd Huston, American News Hub

Skyrocketing University President Salaries Paid For By Student Debt Brendan Pringle, Washington Examiner

As Robot Sales Increase, So Will Jobs For Humans Allan Golombek, RealClearMarkets

A New Stealth Attack In EU’s “War On Cash” Don Quijones, Wolf Street

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.12%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central November Year-to-Year: 2.04% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.8%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]