04/18/2017

The Income Tax Implies That Government Owns You

Jeffrey A. Tucker, Foundation for Economic Education

The income tax is enshrined into law but it is an idea that stands in total contradiction to the driving force behind the American Revolution and the idea of freedom itself. We desperately need a serious national movement to get rid of it – not reform it, not replace it, not flatten it or refocus its sting from this group to that. It just needs to go.

The great essayist Frank Chodorov once described the income tax as the root of all evil. His target was not the tax itself, but the principle behind it. Since its implementation in 1913, he wrote, "The government says to the citizen: 'Your earnings are not exclusively your own; we have a claim on them, and our claim precedes yours; we will allow you to keep some of it, because we recognize your need, not your right; but whatever we grant you for yourself is for us to decide.”

He really does have a point. That's evil. When Congress ratified the 16th Amendment on Feb. 3, 1913, there was a sense in which all private income in the U.S. was nationalized. What was not taxed from then on was a favor granted unto us, and continues to be so.

This is implied in the text of the amendment itself: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

No Limits

Where are the limits? There weren't any. There was some discussion about putting a limit on the tax, but it seemed unnecessary. Only 1% of the income earners would end up paying about 1% to the government. Everyone else was initially untouched. Who really cares that the rich have to pay a bit more, right? They can afford it.

This perspective totally misunderstands the true nature of government, which always wants more money and more power and will stop at nothing to get both. The 16th Amendment was more than a modern additive to an antique document. It was a new philosophy of the fiscal life of the entire country.

Today, the ruling elite no longer bothers with things like amendments. But back in the day, it was different. The amendment was made necessary because of previous court decisions that stated what was once considered a bottom-line presumption of the free society: Government cannot tax personal property. What you make is your own. You get to keep the product of your labors. Government can tax sales, perhaps, or raise money through tariffs on goods coming in and out of the country. But your bank account is off-limits.

The amendment changed that idea. In the beginning, it applied to very few people. This was one reason it passed. It was pitched as a replacement tax, not a new money raiser. After all the havoc caused by the divisive tariffs of the 19th century, this sounded like a great deal to many people, particularly Southerners and Westerners fed up with paying such high prices for manufactured goods while seeing their trading relations with foreign consumers disrupted

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Senate Reaches Agreement To End Shutdown Without DACA Fix Haley Byrd, Weekly Standard

Get Rid Of U.S. Government Shutdowns Forever Ramesh Ponnuru, Bloomberg.com

Free Market Central Interview: This Noted Statistics Expert Says Inflation In 2018 Is Way Higher Than They're Telling Us—And It's Going To Get Worse [LISTEN] Free Market Central

Single-Payer Health Care Isn’t Worth Waiting For Sally C. Pipes, The Wall Street Journal

Who's Lying?: FBI Says 5 Months Of Texts "Lost," Yet IG Horowitz Says His Office Received Them In August Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

Not Only Did Loretta Lynch Know In Advance Of Comey’s Findings On Hillary The DOJ Helped Comey Write His Memo Streiff, RedState

Adam Schiff Doesn’t Want FISA Memo Released Because He Thinks Americans Are TOO STUPID To Understand It [Watch] Joshua Caplan, Gateway Pundit

American History Shows That Expanding The Economy Benefits Everyone Amity Shlaes, City Journal

Will Supreme Court Now Act Against Judges' Campaign To Foil Trump Presidency? Seth Lipsky, New York Sun

Disability Rolls Tumble As Economy Gains Steam Investor’s Business Daily

Expansion Of ‘Free’ British Childcare Has Led To Rationing Through The Backdoor Kristian Niemietz, Institute of Economic Affairs

The Case For This Licensing Scheme Is Ridiculous -- But The Eighth Circuit Just Swallowed It George Leef, Forbes.com

State Democrats Fight To Protect Abused Wealthy Taxpayers From Their Own Misguided Tax Policies Tyler Tate, Americans for Tax Reform

Communist Propaganda Has Infiltrated More Than 100 US Colleges, Posing As Chinese Language Institute Brendan Pringle, Washington Examiner

Public School Was The Worst — Luckily I Had Options Clara M. Brashear, Foundation for Economic Education

Paging Doctor Marx? Theodore Dalrymple, Library of Law and Liberty

Do You Live In One Of These States That People Are Fleeing? Joe Jarvis, Daily Bell

Apple Just An Early Sign Of Tax Reform’s Long-Term Economic Boost Bret Swanson, American Enterprise Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central December Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section