04/16/2017

Don't Whiff On Tax Cuts Like Bush 41

Brian Domitrovic, Forbes.com

Friday the 13th, October 1989. The day started out quietly on the stock exchanges, with the indexes hanging a few points shy of all-time highs. The market’s swell comported with economic facts. Over the past seven years, the nation’s economy had been expanding at the bumper rate of 4.5 percent per annum.

On that Friday the 13th, however, the market would just about crash. The 191-point drop in the Dow industrials that day was the second-worst ever, the 7-percent drop the 12th worst. The drop was, furthermore, prescient. After October 1989, economic growth would creep along at not even a point per year through 1991. The country would endure a recession, the first since the stagflation era a decade before.

Growth would pick up a little after that, firming only when the Republicans took Congress in November 1994, when stocks and bonds troughed and 4.5 percent growth returned through the turn of the millennium.

The recession of 1990-91, foretold by the flash crash in the markets that spooky Friday the 13th in October 1989, remains one of the great oddities of our recent economic history. The 1982-2000 boom was so immense—it resulted in 40 million new jobs, untold number of startups, and a renewed exploration of the American Dream—why did it have even that one interruption, there in the years of President George H.W. Bush?

The reasons are all too relevant to contemporary affairs, namely the matter at hand this spring before the Donald J. Trump administration: should there be a tax reform involving a major cut in tax rates, as roundly promised on the campaign trail?

Several weeks ago, I trucked out to the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library at Texas A&M University and found some documents pertinent to this question. The evening after that flash crash in the fall of 1989, Bush’s own Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) whipped up a memo indicating to the president that his current vacillation on tax-cut promises he had made the year before in the election season was at the root of the stock-market drop—and by extension, the recession that was about to come.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The IG Report Is Our Best Shot At The Truth About Hillary's Emails (And It Could Be Explosive) [Watch] Jason Chaffetz, Fox News

Trump’s Trade Confusion Editorial Board, The Wall Street Journal

Let’s Hope The Trump-Kim Summit Stays Cancelled Rich Lowry, New York Post

Masters Of The Universe: Leaked Documents Show Facebook’s Internal Turmoil About ‘Hate Speech’ Lucas Nolan, Breitbart

Trump’s Best Move Yet—Easing Rules To Fire Bureaucrats Stephen Kruiser, The American Spectator

The Race To Be The Next Speaker Haley Byrd, The Weekly Standard

The New Starbucks Bathroom Policy Is A Terrible Idea [Watch] Katherine Timpf, National Review

TOTALITARIAN IN NYC: De Blasio Issues ‘Cultural Plan’ Linking Museum Funding To Skin Color Ben Shapiro, The Daily Wire

These California Rebels Are Working With Trump, Not Against Him Jarrett Stepman, The Daily Signal

Why Conservatives Shouldn’t Fear That Obama-Netflix Deal [Watch] Christian Toto, Hollywood In Toto

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section