04/14/2017

Chief Justice John Roberts Explains ‘Real Danger’ Facing The Supreme Court

Tré Goins-Phillips, TheBlaze

While conservatives are celebrating the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, Chief Justice John Roberts is warning that there’s a “real danger” facing the high court right now.

During a question-and-answer session at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute earlier this week, Roberts said the “partisan hostility” that surrounded filling the Supreme Court seat vacated with the death of Justice Antonin Scalia threatens the sanctity of the court, the Washington Post reported.

“I want to point out one thing — that throughout this whole process, the Supreme Court has been quietly going about its business of deciding the cases before it, according to the Constitution, in a completely nonpartisan way,” Roberts said. “We’ve done it for the past 14 months with one vacancy, and we’ll do it going in the future now that we have a full complement.”

He continued:

It is a real danger that the partisan hostility that people see in the political branches will affect the nonpartisan activity of the judicial branch. It is very difficult I think for a member of the public to look at what goes on in confirmation hearings these days, which is a very sharp conflict in political terms between Democrats and Republicans, and not think that the person who comes out of that process must similarly share that partisan view of public issues and public life.

The chief justice’s comments came after university President Shirley Ann Jackson asked him about the “extremely partisan confirmation process” that led Senate Republicans to block hearings on former President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, and Democrats’ attempt to filibuster President Donald Trump’s nominee, Gorsuch.

In March 2016, Obama nominated Garland, but Senate Republicans — who controlled the 100-seat chamber — opted not to hold hearings on a Supreme Court appointee because it was an election year. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell argued they were invoking the so-called “Biden rule,” named after a 1992 speech by then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), arguing against high court nominations during then-President George H.W. Bush’s final year in the White House.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Trump To Order Investigation Into FBI/DOJ Surveillance Of His Campaign Justin Caruso, The Daily Caller

H.A.L.P.E.R. Spells Game Up for Obama's Spies Clarice Feldman, American Thinker

Stefan Halper Agent Provocateur – In His Own Words… sundance, The Last Refuge

Mnuchin Says US Has Deal With China To Cut Trade Deficit, Will Hold Off On Tariffs [Watch] Joseph Weber, Fox News

Protect Us from Such ‘Victories’ Don Boudreaux, Café Hayek

Al Sharpton: Royal Wedding Proves White Supremacy ‘On Its Last Breath’ Ben Kew, Breitbart

Hillary Clinton Says She's Not Over The 2016 Election, Pulls Out Russian Hat During Yale Speech [Watch] Naomi Lim, Washington Examiner

Study: Voters Worried About Political Correctness Flocked To Candidate Trump Robby Soave, Reason

Jonathan Swift In A White Suit Matthew Continetti, The Washington Free Beacon

Marijuana Arrests Are Not Racist: Some Neighborhoods Have Heavier Enforcement Because They Have More Crime, And Complaints Seth Barron, New York Daily News

Andrew Sullivan: Obama’s Legacy Is Dead And Trump Killed It streiff, RedState

Starbucks Is About To Woke Their Way Out Of Business Jazz Shaw, Hot Air

Elizabeth Warren Boldly Pledges To Never Take Money From A Group That Has Never Donated To Her [Watch] Timothy Meads, Townhall

Jordan B. Peterson Isn't Criticizing Women When He Discusses "Agreeableness" Sean Malone, Foundation For Economic Education

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section