Chris Christie Needs A New (And Responsible) Strategy To Fight Opioid Abuse [Watch]

Steve Forbes, Fox News

First off, let me say that Chris Christie, in my opinion, has been a highly effective governor who has chalked up- despite formidable obstacles- -- a number of positive, concrete achievements of enormous value to the well-being of the Garden State.

New Jersey has been lucky to have him.  

But he has proposed a plan to combat opioid abuse that doesn’t make sense. He has been given bad advice. He needs to hit the reset button and come up with a strategy that will fix this serious problem without creating more problems.

Gov. Christie is absolutely right to make opioid addiction in New Jersey a real priority. As an adviser to the Trump administration on combatting the nationwide opioid epidemic, Gov. Christie knows his home state is suffering more than most.

New Jersey’s rate of heroin overdose is three times the national average and drug overdose is now our leading cause of accidental death. There are roughly 128,000 heroin users in New Jersey, with opioid addiction affecting citizens across a broad spectrum of age and income brackets.

In a budget speech, Gov. Christie proposed funding expanded drug rehabilitation treatment for uninsured New Jerseyans by taking $300 million from the  reserve fund of non-profit Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, money he termed an “abundant surplus.”  There are several things wrong with this plan.

In the first place, good New Jersey corporate citizen Horizon has for 85 years been providing high quality, affordable health insurance in every corner and to every citizen   including traditionally vulnerable populations such as the poor or elderly. While it is a not-for-profit, it is not a charity but a uniquely structured entity that paid $545 million in taxes last year, including $207 million to the state and $6 million in local property taxes.

And their reserves – a necessity for any insurance provider – are anything but excessive. In fact, just the opposite – while adequate, they are shrinking due to the increased risk associated with insuring so many vulnerable citizens including those now covered as a result of the ACA.

Read full article

You May Also Like:

On Social Media, What's Genius For Obama Is Scandal When It Comes To Trump [Watch] Ben Shapiro, The Hill

The Problem Is Facebook, Not Cambridge Analytica Leonid Bershidsky, Bloomberg

The Sad Hysteria Of The Southern Poverty Law Center Shikha Dalmia, The Week

‘Armed School Resource Officer’ Took Down Maryland High School Shooter Christian Datoc, Daily Caller

What Went Wrong At The FBI Thomas J. Baker, The Wall Street Journal

Nafta Is A Critical Part Of The U.S.’s Economic Future Dan K. Eberhart, Investor’s Business Daily

Hillary Should Just Admit She Hates Half Of America Katherine Timpf, National Review

Democrats’ Obstructionism Is Unprecedented John Hinderaker, PowerLine Blog

Collapse Of Credibility In Mainstream Press Puts Burden On Readers Ira Stoll, New York Sun

At $21 TRILLION, The National Debt Is Growing 36% Faster Than The US Economy Simon Black, Sovereign Man

Two Million Get Off Food Stamps During Trump's First Year Tom Knighton, PJ Media

RNC Raises $12.8 Million In February, Breaks Another Fundraising Record Jack Heretik, Washington Free Beacon

What Could Go Wrong With Obama-era Appointees Putting All Our National Security Eggs In Amazon's Basket? Jared Whitley, Weekly Standard

Alert: Dems Just Got 5 Congressional Seats Courtesy Of The SCOTUS Kevin Daley, Conservative Tribune

The Truth About Medicaid Work Requirements Angela Rachidi, American Enterprise Institute

Millennials Aren’t Saving Because They Think Capitalism Will Be Finished By The Time They Reach 65 Matt Vespa, Townhall

Homeschooling: The Best Hope For America's Future Lloyd Marcus, American Thinker

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference


In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).


-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot

FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.14%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.8%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central February Year-to-Year: 1.8% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]