04/12/2017

The Deeper Scandal Of That Brutal United Video [Watch]

Derek Thompson, The Atlantic

It is the “re-accommodation” heard ’round the world: A passenger on an overbooked United flight from Chicago to Louisville on Sunday night was ripped out of his seat by uniformed officers and dragged down the aisle on his back like carry-on luggage, as several horrified passengers captured video footage of his bloodied face on their phones.

The incident created a firestorm online, which only intensified after United published a mealy-mouthed statement on Monday morning that seemed to blame the bruised customer and apologized only for “the overbooking situation.” After several hours, punctuating the sordid event with the least human-sounding statement in crisis-PR history, United CEO Oscar Munoz apologized "for having to re-accommodate” customers, as if the brutalized passenger had merely been asked to switch from an aisle seat.

Sometimes, a shocking controversy like this one is both freakish and representative. Indeed, this incident is both an extraordinary occurrence—overbookings are common yet rarely involve thuggish yanking—and also a dramatic reminder of the profoundly unequal, and even morally scandalous, relationship between consumers and corporations in industries where a handful of large companies dominate the sector.

But first, a few details to flesh out the story. According to one flyer, soon after the passengers boarded the flight, United announced that four of them would have to give up their seats to make room for United employees commuting to work a flight out of Louisville. After the offer was raised to $800, and nobody was willing to leave the flight (perhaps because it would require missing a full day's work without a compelling excuse), somebody from United announced that a computer would randomly select four people to leave the plane. When the man in the video, a doctor, was selected, he refused to leave his seat, saying he had to see patients the following morning. United called officers to the scene. The rest is now a matter of digital record.

Can United really do this? Legally, the airlines can turn away paying customers, and they do it thousands of times a year. Airlines often overbook flights to account for the likelihood that passengers won’t show up, and, although this can be extremely annoying, it is also legal and might even contribute to lower prices for tickets, because it increases the likelihood that planes will be filled to capacity.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Good Riddance To The North Korea Summit David French, National Review

Starbucks’ Homeless Problem Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal

Trump Signs Dodd-Frank Rollback [Watch] Sylvan Lane, The Hill

Tide Is Now Running In Favor Of Trump, As Mueller Turns Boring Conrad Black, New York Sun

Progressives On The Brink Jeffrey Folks, American Thinker

The FBI Used Its Secret Spy Program To Protect Killers, Jail Innocents, And Screw Victims Sean Davis, The Federalist

Amazon Demonetizes Conservative Website Legal Insurrection William A. Jacobson, Legal Insurrection

Left-Wing Billionaire Michael Bloomberg: Raising Taxes On Poor People Is A ‘Good Thing’ [Watch] Americans for Tax Reform

A Truce In The Trade War Is Good News. Trump Can Make It Better By Scrapping The Tariffs. Tori Whiting, Daily Signal

Why Socialists Are Despised, As Explained By George Orwell Tim Reuter, Forbes.com

Starbucks’ New ‘Culture Of Warmth’ Gets A Cold Reception [Watch] Michelle Gant, Fox News

3 Fastest Growing U.S. Cities All In Texas; San Antonio Has Largest Gain Terence P. Jeffrey, CNSNews

New York City Drivers Paying $5 Gas Andrew Moran, Economic Collapse News

High Marginal Tax Rates On The Poor Are Creating An Underground Economy Alex Tabarrok, Foundation for Economic Education

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section