04/11/2017

Is Foreign Aid The Answer? Nope, It’s Free Trade

Ben Ramanauskas, Economic Collapse News

In his recent Guardian article, David Cameron, the former UK prime minister and newly appointed Chair of the Commission on State Fragility, Growth and Development, argued that it is right for the United Kingdom to continue to give aid to developing and unstable countries. Mr. Cameron argued that it is the responsibility of the UK government to give aid supporting developing countries as not only is it the moral thing to do, but it is also in the interests of the UK.

Following on from Mr. Cameron’s article, I would like to argue for a better way in which the UK can help less developed countries and also advance its own interests: free trade.

As the UK prepares to leave the European Union, it gives the government an unprecedented opportunity to examine its trade policy and to forge new free-trade-based relationships with the EU and with the rest of the world. Free trade has brought economic prosperity and lifted millions of people out of poverty in a way which is unmatched in human history. Free trade not only benefits all countries involved economically but also promotes peace and goodwill between those countries. Therefore, the UK should aim to pursue free trade with countries all over the world.

However, the newly formed Department for International Trade might face opposition — especially from developing or fragile states — in the form of protectionism. If such a situation were to arise, the UK should pursue a policy of unilateral free trade with these less economically developed countries. It should do so for two main reasons.

The first reason is that it is the morally right thing to do. As mentioned above, free trade brings economic prosperity to all parties involved. As a result, if the UK removed tariffs on its imports from developing countries in regions such as Africa, this would be incredibly beneficial for some of the poorest people on the planet.

To illustrate this point, let’s think about coffee and the EU’s protectionist approach. A 7.5 percent tariff is imposed on roasted coffee from Africa in EU countries. However, non-decaffeinated green coffee attracts no such tariffs.1 Such protectionist policies can keep countries trapped in a situation where they can only realistically export raw materials; it prevents them from adding value to their produce.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Trump To Order Investigation Into FBI/DOJ Surveillance Of His Campaign Justin Caruso, The Daily Caller

H.A.L.P.E.R. Spells Game Up for Obama's Spies Clarice Feldman, American Thinker

Stefan Halper Agent Provocateur – In His Own Words… sundance, The Last Refuge

Mnuchin Says US Has Deal With China To Cut Trade Deficit, Will Hold Off On Tariffs [Watch] Joseph Weber, Fox News

Protect Us from Such ‘Victories’ Don Boudreaux, Café Hayek

Al Sharpton: Royal Wedding Proves White Supremacy ‘On Its Last Breath’ Ben Kew, Breitbart

Hillary Clinton Says She's Not Over The 2016 Election, Pulls Out Russian Hat During Yale Speech [Watch] Naomi Lim, Washington Examiner

Study: Voters Worried About Political Correctness Flocked To Candidate Trump Robby Soave, Reason

Jonathan Swift In A White Suit Matthew Continetti, The Washington Free Beacon

Marijuana Arrests Are Not Racist: Some Neighborhoods Have Heavier Enforcement Because They Have More Crime, And Complaints Seth Barron, New York Daily News

Andrew Sullivan: Obama’s Legacy Is Dead And Trump Killed It streiff, RedState

Starbucks Is About To Woke Their Way Out Of Business Jazz Shaw, Hot Air

Elizabeth Warren Boldly Pledges To Never Take Money From A Group That Has Never Donated To Her [Watch] Timothy Meads, Townhall

Jordan B. Peterson Isn't Criticizing Women When He Discusses "Agreeableness" Sean Malone, Foundation For Economic Education

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section