04/10/2017

How To Stop The Feds From Robbing The Innocent

Jacob Sullum, New York Post

During a meeting with county sheriffs in February, President Trump was puzzled by criticism of civil-asset forfeiture, which all the cops in the room viewed as an indispensable and unobjectionable law-enforcement tool. “Do you even understand the other side of it?” the president asked. “No,” one sheriff said, and that was that.

Trump might get a more helpful answer if he asked Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), who last week reintroduced a bill aimed at curtailing civil-forfeiture abuses. As he observed, “These abuses threaten citizens’ constitutional rights, put unnecessary burdens on innocent Americans, and weaken our faith in law enforcement.”

Civil forfeiture lets the government confiscate property allegedly linked to crime without bringing charges against the owner. Since law-enforcement agencies receive most or all of the proceeds from the forfeitures they initiate, they have a strong financial incentive to loot first and ask questions never, which explains why those sheriffs were not eager to enlighten the president about the downside of such legalized theft.

A new report from the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General highlights the potential for abuse. Between fiscal years 2007 and 2016, the OIG found that the Drug Enforcement Administration took $4.2 billion in cash, more than 80 percent of it through administrative forfeitures, meaning there was no judicial oversight because the owners did not challenge the seizures in court.

Although the DEA would argue that the lack of challenges proves the owners were guilty, that is not true. The process for recovering seized property is daunting, complicated, time-consuming and expensive, often costing more than the property is worth.

Consider Charles Clarke, a college student who, in 2014, lost $11,000 in savings to cops at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport who said his suitcase smelled of marijuana. No contraband was found, and as is typical in such cases, the allegations in the federal seizure affidavit were absurdly vague, merely asserting that the money had something to do with illegal drugs.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Democrats Had No Business Winning In Alabama John Podhoretz, New York Post

Republicans Have A Final Deal On Their Tax Bill — Here's What's In It Bob Bryan, Business Insider

Steve Bannon's Big Loss In Alabama Roger L. Simon, PJ Media

‘We Can’t Take That Risk’ — FBI Officials Discussed ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump Presidency Chuck Ross, Daily Caller

Report: Wait Times For Canada Gov. Health Care 128% Higher Than In ‘93 Bacchus Barua, Fraser Institute

The Left's 'Reverse Robin Hood' Tax Reform Narrative Is Bunk Bernie Marcus, The Hill

Illinois Drives People Away The Wall Street Journal

Double Standards And Distortions Heather Mac Donald, City Journal

Pete King Blasts ‘Disheveled Drunk’ Steve Bannon Bob Fredericks, New York Post

Report: Lawyer Caught Offering Woman $200,000 To Accuse Trump Of Sex Assault V. Saxena, Conservative Tribune

Government Should Leave Bakers Alone Ron Paul, Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

100 Years. 100 Million Lives. Think Twice. Laura M. Nicolae, Harvard Crimson

Liberate Food Trucks [Watch] John Stossel, Townhall

While Everyone Was Distracted By Alabama Election, Senate Passed Tight Vote To Give Trump A Huge Victory Warner Todd Huston, American News Hub

Skyrocketing University President Salaries Paid For By Student Debt Brendan Pringle, Washington Examiner

As Robot Sales Increase, So Will Jobs For Humans Allan Golombek, RealClearMarkets

A New Stealth Attack In EU’s “War On Cash” Don Quijones, Wolf Street

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.12%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central November Year-to-Year: 2.04% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.8%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]