04/09/2017

Understanding High-Risk Pools As Part Of Obamacare Replacement

Edmund Haislmaier, The Daily Signal

As House Republicans try to negotiate an agreement on the design of Obamacare repeal and replace legislation, specific elements are often referenced using shorthand terminology.

While understandable, this can result in confusion if the same (or similar) term is applied to different concepts.

An example is the term “high-risk pool,” which has recently been used as a shorthand reference for what are really three different concepts, depending on who is using the term.

Traditionally, the term “high-risk pool” refers to a separate arrangement under which insurance companies operating in a given market collectively subsidize (that is, pool) the extra costs for providing coverage to individuals who, because they are poor risks, have been refused coverage under standard policies.

In this construct, those individuals are given coverage that is separate and different from that obtained by other people in the general market.

However, the term “high-risk pool” has also been sometimes used as shorthand for two other related, but different, concepts.

One concept can be more accurately described as a “risk transfer pool.” Under this design, for a given market, each insurer’s claims experience is compared to the collective (that is, pooled) experience of the whole market.

Then, based upon an agreed formula, a portion of premium revenues are transferred from the insurers whose experience was significantly better than the norm to the insurers whose experience was significantly worse than the norm.

The idea is to adjust for potential selection effects so that an insurer is compensated if it attracts a larger than normal share of costly enrollees.

Thus, as with a traditional high-risk pool, under a risk transfer pool the cost of expensive enrollees is spread across all insurers in the market. However, unlike in a traditional high-risk pool arrangement, costly individuals aren’t given separate coverage.

In sum, the difference is that the latter concept involves moving money, but without also moving people into different coverage.

Finally, the third concept basically consists of relabeling publicly funded “reinsurance” and calling it “high-risk pool funding.”

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Reports: Kushner Had Multiple Undisclosed Conversations With Kislyak, Discussed "Back Channel" Comms Jennifer Van Laar, Townhall

The Real Reason Zuckerberg Supports A Universal Basic Income TDB, Zero Hedge

Obama Administration Transferred MS-13 Gang Members To Placement Centers Across The Country Warren Mass, New American

Poland Stands Up To EU On Forced Quotas: We’re Not Taking Your Migrants – Your Blackmail Won’t Work On Us Damien Cowley, The Gateway Pundit

Progressively Bankrupt Richard A. Epstein, Hoover Institution

Obama Attempts Government In Exile Wesley Pruden, The Washington Times

Report: Insurance Rates Could Skyrocket Under Border Adjustment Tax Americans For Prosperity

Memo To CBO: Obamacare Is Unsustainable Charles Hughes, Economics21

Paid Parental Leave Proposal Increases The Cost Of Employment And Burdens States Trey Kovacs, Competitive Enterprise Institute

LEFTISTS SILENT: CBO Confirms Repeal Of Obamacare SAVES BILLIONS Kelly Beasley, The BlackSphere

No, CEOs Don't Make 347 Times More Than American Workers Luka Ladan, Washington Examiner

Don’t Just Blame Sean Hannity For The Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory Robert Tracinski, The Federalist

Obama Lectures Trump Over Walls, Builds One Around D.C. Home Edmund Kozak, PoliZette

Confederate Monuments And Civil Discourse William Watkins, Independent Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.4%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.1%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]