04/09/2017

Understanding High-Risk Pools As Part Of Obamacare Replacement

Edmund Haislmaier, The Daily Signal

As House Republicans try to negotiate an agreement on the design of Obamacare repeal and replace legislation, specific elements are often referenced using shorthand terminology.

While understandable, this can result in confusion if the same (or similar) term is applied to different concepts.

An example is the term “high-risk pool,” which has recently been used as a shorthand reference for what are really three different concepts, depending on who is using the term.

Traditionally, the term “high-risk pool” refers to a separate arrangement under which insurance companies operating in a given market collectively subsidize (that is, pool) the extra costs for providing coverage to individuals who, because they are poor risks, have been refused coverage under standard policies.

In this construct, those individuals are given coverage that is separate and different from that obtained by other people in the general market.

However, the term “high-risk pool” has also been sometimes used as shorthand for two other related, but different, concepts.

One concept can be more accurately described as a “risk transfer pool.” Under this design, for a given market, each insurer’s claims experience is compared to the collective (that is, pooled) experience of the whole market.

Then, based upon an agreed formula, a portion of premium revenues are transferred from the insurers whose experience was significantly better than the norm to the insurers whose experience was significantly worse than the norm.

The idea is to adjust for potential selection effects so that an insurer is compensated if it attracts a larger than normal share of costly enrollees.

Thus, as with a traditional high-risk pool, under a risk transfer pool the cost of expensive enrollees is spread across all insurers in the market. However, unlike in a traditional high-risk pool arrangement, costly individuals aren’t given separate coverage.

In sum, the difference is that the latter concept involves moving money, but without also moving people into different coverage.

Finally, the third concept basically consists of relabeling publicly funded “reinsurance” and calling it “high-risk pool funding.”

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Science March: Do Researchers Risk Becoming Just Another Leftwing Interest Group? [Watch] Ronald Bailey, Reason.com

President Trump Should Run, Not Walk, Away From The Paris Climate Treaty Joseph Bast, Heartland Insitute

REMINDER: Earth Day Founder Murdered/Composted His Girlfriend Weasel Zippers

You Are Richer Than John D. Rockefeller Donald J. Boudreaux

WashPost Reveals The Left's Goal: The 'Mission Was To Bring Down Bill O'Reilly' Tim Graham, mrcNewsBusters

Why Are Republicans Making Tax Reform So Hard? [Watch] Steve Forbes, Larry Kudlow, Arthur B. Laffer And Stephen Moore, The New York Times

Will Tax Reform Fail, Too? Judson Philips, The Washington Times

Why Can’t The Clintons Just Go Away? Maureen Callahan, New York Post

Now There’s “Physically Average Privilege" Katherine Timpf, National Review

The Two Bills: Clinton And O'Reilly Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

I Was Fake News Before Fake News Was Cool [Watch] Ted Noel, M.D., American Thinker

Rachel Dolezal’s South African Road Show [Watch] Bob Parks, Black&Right

How Landlord De Blasio Games The Tax Code Nicole Gelinas, New York Post

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

SHARE

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature



Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

SHARE

Keynesian Economics and the Great Depression

Hillsdale College economics professor Gary Wolfram discusses Keynesian economics and the factors that pulled the national economy out of the Great Depression. The story of World War II shows that government spending may produce activity, but not the prosperity of a truly healthy economy.

 

-- Gary Wolfram, Hillsdale College,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    BLS: 4.5%
    Shadow Stats: 22.5%
  • Inflation:
    March Year-to-Year: 2.74% (CPI-U*)
    Shadow Stats: 10.5%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]