04/08/2017

Is Tillerson Being Sidelined By Jared Kushner?

John Fund, National Review

History suggests that the Trump administration should think twice before completely ignoring Foggy Bottom on key foreign-policy decisions.

Palace intrigue dominated news of the Trump White House this week, as rumors swirled that populist chief strategist Steve Bannon had lost influence to Gary Cohn, the registered Democrat who heads the National Economic Council. Now, elsewhere in the administration, another power play appears to be under way: Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, made a splash with a highly visible trip to Iraq on behalf of the White House, and is handling portfolios involving parts of U.S. policy toward China, the Middle East, and Mexico. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson looks increasingly marginalized.

This has happened before. For nearly five years, Richard Nixon kept his old friend Bill Rogers as his nominal secretary of state, while the real diplomatic clout was wielded by Henry Kissinger, the national-security adviser. It was Kissinger who arranged Nixon’s historic visit to China, successfully pursued nuclear-arms-reduction talks with the Soviet Union, and led negotiations with Hanoi to end the Vietnam War. Cynics dubbed Rogers the “secretary of the links” because of all the time he had to play golf. “You could walk through Rogers’ deepest influence on foreign policy and not get your ankles wet,” cracked the late Nixon speechwriter and columnist William Safire.

No one is suggesting that Tillerson, the type-A former CEO of ExxonMobil, will allow himself to be satisfied with a golf cart. But he certainly appears not to have a front-row seat on many foreign-policy issues. He was absent at President Trump’s meetings with the leaders of Israel, Canada, and Japan, and he wasn’t consulted on Trump’s botched executive order restricting non-citizen entry to the U.S. The White House overruled his pick of Elliott Abrams as the No. 2 man at State after Trump was made aware that Abrams had publicly criticized him during the 2016 campaign.

To date, Tillerson is Trump’s only political appointee at the State Department; two dozen other such posts remain unfilled, and the vacuum could have serious consequences. “The longer Tillerson is ‘home alone’ at State, the more he relies on Obama holdovers who don’t have the administration’s best interests at heart,” one former State Department official told me. “The more that happens, the less willing the White House is to give Tillerson the staff he wants.”

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The Democrat Answer To The Nunes Memo Is Here Susan Wright, RedState

Assessing The New Democratic Intel Memo Byron York, Washington Examiner

Mona Charen Slams Sexist Hypocrisy And Racism At CPAC; Calls invitation Of Le Pen A 'Disgrace' Alice B. Lloyd, The Weekly Standard

President Trump, Beware The Invisible Threat, Cheapening The Dollar And Killing The Bull Market Ralph Benko, Forbes.com

The Russians Colluded Massively — With Democrats Deroy Murdock, National Review

Tech Giants Are Less Powerful Than They Seem Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. , The Wall Street Journal

Cathy McMorris Rodgers: ‘We Are Going To Have To Defy History’ To Hold House GOP Majority Matthew Boyle, Breitbart

Net Neutrality Zealots Are Wrong — The Market Just Proved It Investor’s Business Daily

I Renewed My NRA Membership Because Attacks On 2nd Amendment Rights Never Stop There William A. Jacobson , Legal Insurrection

Progressive Totalitarians And Nativist Nationalists In Our Midst Richard Ebeling, Heartland Institute

Tariffs Won't Help Make America Great Again Robert Caskey, American Thinker

#UsToo: How Liberal Feminism Excludes Millions Of Women Kelsey Harkness, The Daily Signal

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.15%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.8%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central January Year-to-Year: 2.11% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section