04/07/2017

After Studying Basic Economics, Liberal Mayor Vetoes Minimum Wage Increase

Brittany Hunter, Foundation for Economic Education

There can be no denying that legislatively speaking, the Fight for Fifteen movement garnered huge wins during the last election cycle both on city and state levels.

No matter how much success or popularity an initiative manages to earn at the ballot box, there are economic laws that cannot be avoided, even when good intentions are accounted for—something some politicians are starting to figure out.

A Complete 180

Last week, Baltimore’s new Democratic Mayor, Catherine Pugh, surprised her constituents by changing her position on the issue of raising the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour.

This came as a shock to those who had previously supported her during her mayoral run when she not only vocally promised to support the legislation, but also said in writing on a union questionnaire that, "I am aware of the current initiative to raise the minimum wage in the City Council to $15 per hour and when it reaches my desk I will sign it."

However, after she was elected into office and when the minimum legislation did reach the new Baltimore Mayor’s desk, instead of signing the legislation, Mayor Pugh used her power to veto it!

Pugh, who is only four months into her term as mayor, did what many mayors have not taken the time, nor had the courage to do: she actually researched the economic policies set to be implemented in the legislation, and the potential harm these policies could cause in Baltimore.

As a result of what she learned, Pugh decided she could no longer in good conscience support or sign the legislation when the economic repercussions were potentially dangerous enough to harm her entire city.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Senate Reaches Agreement To End Shutdown Without DACA Fix Haley Byrd, Weekly Standard

Get Rid Of U.S. Government Shutdowns Forever Ramesh Ponnuru, Bloomberg.com

Free Market Central Interview: This Noted Statistics Expert Says Inflation In 2018 Is Way Higher Than They're Telling Us—And It's Going To Get Worse [LISTEN] Free Market Central

Single-Payer Health Care Isn’t Worth Waiting For Sally C. Pipes, The Wall Street Journal

Who's Lying?: FBI Says 5 Months Of Texts "Lost," Yet IG Horowitz Says His Office Received Them In August Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

Not Only Did Loretta Lynch Know In Advance Of Comey’s Findings On Hillary The DOJ Helped Comey Write His Memo Streiff, RedState

Adam Schiff Doesn’t Want FISA Memo Released Because He Thinks Americans Are TOO STUPID To Understand It [Watch] Joshua Caplan, Gateway Pundit

American History Shows That Expanding The Economy Benefits Everyone Amity Shlaes, City Journal

Will Supreme Court Now Act Against Judges' Campaign To Foil Trump Presidency? Seth Lipsky, New York Sun

Disability Rolls Tumble As Economy Gains Steam Investor’s Business Daily

Expansion Of ‘Free’ British Childcare Has Led To Rationing Through The Backdoor Kristian Niemietz, Institute of Economic Affairs

The Case For This Licensing Scheme Is Ridiculous -- But The Eighth Circuit Just Swallowed It George Leef, Forbes.com

State Democrats Fight To Protect Abused Wealthy Taxpayers From Their Own Misguided Tax Policies Tyler Tate, Americans for Tax Reform

Communist Propaganda Has Infiltrated More Than 100 US Colleges, Posing As Chinese Language Institute Brendan Pringle, Washington Examiner

Public School Was The Worst — Luckily I Had Options Clara M. Brashear, Foundation for Economic Education

Paging Doctor Marx? Theodore Dalrymple, Library of Law and Liberty

Do You Live In One Of These States That People Are Fleeing? Joe Jarvis, Daily Bell

Apple Just An Early Sign Of Tax Reform’s Long-Term Economic Boost Bret Swanson, American Enterprise Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central December Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section