04/06/2017

How FDA Rules Made A $15 Drug Cost $400

Mark L. Baum, Wall Street Journal

The theory is that generic drugs should be less expensive than the original. By the time a generic hits the market, the drug’s patent has expired, allowing competition from companies that didn’t spend millions of dollars to develop it. As more options become available, prices are supposed to drop. But because of quirks in America’s regulatory system, it doesn’t always work out this way.

In 2009 the Food and Drug Administration approved a new version of colchicine, which treats symptoms of gout. Prices rose from 25 cents to $6 per pill. Two years later, the agency approved a new hydroxyprogesterone, which helps prevent premature births. It went from $15 to $400 an injection. In 2014 the FDA approved a generic of the man-made hormone vasopressin. Prices jumped from $11 to $138 for an injection.

What explains the counterintuitive price increases? All these prescription drugs fall under a category known as DESI drugs, named for their inclusion in an FDA program called Drug Efficacy Study Implementation. These drugs came to market before 1962, when getting FDA approval for a drug required proving its safety but not its efficacy. Such drugs, manufactured under expired patents, are used by millions of Americans today.

But once the FDA approves a new-drug application for a DESI drug, the existing drug can be pulled from the market. The “new” drug is treated as a material advance because it underwent testing for safety and efficacy—even though the DESI version was proved safe and effective over decades of actual use. The developer of the new drug may also get a new period of market exclusivity that lasts three years.

This makes little sense. Market exclusivity should let pharmaceutical companies recoup their often enormous investments in genuinely new drugs. Giving monopoly protection for what is essentially a generic version of a DESI drug merely enriches sharp-dealing companies while injuring patients.

Another reason generics often face no competition was described by Scott Gottlieb, President Trump’s nominee for FDA commissioner, in these pages last year. He noted that a generic-drug application can cost as much as $15 million. This high upfront cost is part of why would-be manufacturers of generics often pass on the opportunity to compete against branded drugs with smaller markets. This has allowed many pharmaceutical companies to raise prices with impunity.

[Subscription required.]

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Republicans, Stand Up For Health Freedom Phil Gramm, The Wall Street Journal

Tax Reform Will Boost Workers And Business [Watch] Steven Mnuchin, The Philadelphia Inquirer

FBI Informant Blocked From Telling Congress About Russia Nuclear Corruption Case, Lawyer Says [Watch] John Solomon and Alison Spann, The Hill

The Last Years Of The Republic Niall Ferguson, Boston Globe

Trump Accuses James Comey Of Lying To Protect Hillary Sally Persons, Washington Times

Free At Last! Betsy McCaughey, RealClearPolitics

The Purge: Scott Yenor And The Witch Hunt At Boise State Ben Shapiro, Weekly Standard

CNN Smears Sensible EPA Decision John Stossel, Reason

The $64,000 Question: Who Wants A Job? Jeffrey Dorfman, Forbes.com

Condemning Harvey, Still Clinging To Bill And Teddy George Neumayr, American Spectator

Soros Transfers $18 Billion To Nonprofit Network That Advances His Left Wing Agenda Andrew Mark Miller, America News

Single-Payer Nightmare: Britain's NHS Proposes Suspending Surgeries For Smokers And Obese Patients Guy Benson, Townhall

The Facts About Who Pays The Most In Taxes In America Walter E. Williams, Daily Signal

School Cancels Halloween: 'Not Inclusive' Enough Paul Bois, Daily Wire

Jumping On The Anti-GMO Bandwagon Hits The Poor The Hardest Tirzah Duren, CapX

If Catalonia Fails, We All Fail Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg

Krugman And The ‘Heroic’ Fed William L. Anderson, Mises Institute

Nobelist Richard Thaler’s Economic Insights Apply To Big Government As Well Mike Rappaport, Library of Law and Liberty

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

When America Was Truly The Land Of Opportunity

For [early immigrants] America was truly the land of opportunity. For the first time in their lives, many were truly free to pursue their own objectives. That freedom released the human energies which created the United States. There were few government programs to turn to and nobody expected them. But also there were few rules and regulations. There were no licenses, no permits, no red tape to restrict them. They found, in fact, a free market, and most of them thrived on it. 

-- Milton Friedman,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.44%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.2%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central September Year-to-Year: 1.94% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.7%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]