04/05/2017

History Lesson: On Judicial Nominations, GOP Must Punish Democrats For Decades Of Unprecedented Escalations [Watch]

Guy Benson, Townhall

Monday marked one of the most partisan days in the history of the United States Senate. As the body's judiciary committee trudged through the process of voting to advance the nomination of an eminently qualified jurist to the full chamber for consideration, strictly along party lines, reports emerged that Democrats had secured the 41 votes necessary to sustain the first partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee in US history. This unprecedented escalation will almost certainly force Republicans to follow in the footsteps of a previous unprecedented escalation from Democrats, changing the Senate rules to do away with the 60-vote filibuster threshold for all presidential nominees. This partisan denouement represents an inevitable culmination of decades of bare-knuckled one-upsmanship in which Democrats have been the aggressors at nearly every turn. Tracing the current state of play back to one single moment or controversy may be difficult, but many would argue that it began with an astoundingly acerbic and demagogic 1987 floor speech by Sen. Ted Kennedy, who once killed a woman, against President Reagan's nominee to the High Court, Robert Bork.


A pitched battle ensued, led by liberal Democrats, with Bork ultimately being defeated. During the term of President George H.W. Bush, the Left tried to replicate their character assassination playbook against Clarence Thomas, who was subjected to an extremely nasty and personal confirmation fight. He was eventually confirmed 52-48, the closest margin in more than 100 years. By contrast, President Clinton's judicial nominees were confirmed at a higher rate than his predecessor's, and neither of his picks for the Supreme Court faced any serious opposition. Even uber-liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was set to alter the make-up of the Court by replacing a significantly more conservative justice, was approved by an overwhelming 96-3 margin. Even after the ugliness and vitriol of Democrats' treatment of Bork and Thomas, the GOP did not answer in kind.

But when President George W. Bush took office in the early 2000's, Senate Democrats decided to push the envelope again. For the first time in history, they filibustered a number of majority-supported Bush nominees to circuit- and district-level courts. The most egregious example of this obstructionism targeted a exceptionally qualified nominee named Miguel Estrada. While colluding with left-wing interest groups, Democrats literally spelled out in a memo that part of the reason they chose to blockade Estrada was because of his race. As a Latino, they worried, he could be groomed into a prime candidate for an eventual Supreme Court slot; better to kill his prospects as early as possible. They filibustered him for years, ultimately resulting in his decision to withdraw his name from consideration -- a disgraceful episode in which Democrats succeeded in convincing a willing press corps to ignore their extreme partisanship and shameful racial politics, and to instead focus on the "scandal" of who had leaked their internal memos. 

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Reports: Kushner Had Multiple Undisclosed Conversations With Kislyak, Discussed "Back Channel" Comms Jennifer Van Laar, Townhall

The Real Reason Zuckerberg Supports A Universal Basic Income TDB, Zero Hedge

Obama Administration Transferred MS-13 Gang Members To Placement Centers Across The Country Warren Mass, New American

Poland Stands Up To EU On Forced Quotas: We’re Not Taking Your Migrants – Your Blackmail Won’t Work On Us Damien Cowley, The Gateway Pundit

Progressively Bankrupt Richard A. Epstein, Hoover Institution

Obama Attempts Government In Exile Wesley Pruden, The Washington Times

Report: Insurance Rates Could Skyrocket Under Border Adjustment Tax Americans For Prosperity

Memo To CBO: Obamacare Is Unsustainable Charles Hughes, Economics21

Paid Parental Leave Proposal Increases The Cost Of Employment And Burdens States Trey Kovacs, Competitive Enterprise Institute

LEFTISTS SILENT: CBO Confirms Repeal Of Obamacare SAVES BILLIONS Kelly Beasley, The BlackSphere

No, CEOs Don't Make 347 Times More Than American Workers Luka Ladan, Washington Examiner

Don’t Just Blame Sean Hannity For The Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory Robert Tracinski, The Federalist

Obama Lectures Trump Over Walls, Builds One Around D.C. Home Edmund Kozak, PoliZette

Confederate Monuments And Civil Discourse William Watkins, Independent Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.4%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.1%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]