04/03/2017

April Fools’ Day: A Little Humor Can Spell Big Trouble For College Newspapers

Daniel Burnett, FIRE.org

The University of Alaska-Fairbanks is planning to construct a new building in the shape of a vagina. Administrators at the University of Wisconsin-Superior are selling drugs out of a new campus meth lab in a scheme to lower tuition rates. Parking authority personnel near Rutgers University will start throwing grenades at drivers who park in the wrong location.

Don’t believe me? Good instinct.

These stories were all part of college newspapers’ satirical April Fools’ Day editions —and they all caught the critical attention of school administrators.

College publications annually push the envelope to put out gag editions poking fun at administrators, faculty, fellow students, and themselves. The result is a mixed bag of both clever criticism and jokes that don’t land, but the tradition almost always yields administrators rattling the sabres of censorship.

If the past is any indication, someone, somewhere will soon be holding a copy of their campus newspaper’s April Fools’ Day edition … and not laughing. In fact, they may be filing complaints with the school’s administration, which could lead to a prolonged investigation. Or they may go storming to their (not so) friendly campus “bias response team.”

Disturbingly, colleges have indeed launched full-fledged investigations into newspapers following satirical editions, threatening the publications with loss of funding and future oversight by content review boards. Staff members have been subjected to sensitivity training. Editors fired. Newspapers themselves confiscated.

In the name of being “inclusive” and polite, too many administrations seem willing to squelch free speech. But satire is a time-honored means of criticizing existing conditions — and it’s a protected one at that on public campuses. (Private institutions that grant students free speech rights have a duty to honor that promise, too.)  So even when it misses the mark, ruffles feathers, or upsets, the First Amendment is very clear: Satire is protected by the Constitution.

Just ask someone who helped write it.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The IG Report Is Our Best Shot At The Truth About Hillary's Emails (And It Could Be Explosive) [Watch] Jason Chaffetz, Fox News

Trump’s Trade Confusion Editorial Board, The Wall Street Journal

Let’s Hope The Trump-Kim Summit Stays Cancelled Rich Lowry, New York Post

Masters Of The Universe: Leaked Documents Show Facebook’s Internal Turmoil About ‘Hate Speech’ Lucas Nolan, Breitbart

Trump’s Best Move Yet—Easing Rules To Fire Bureaucrats Stephen Kruiser, The American Spectator

The Race To Be The Next Speaker Haley Byrd, The Weekly Standard

The New Starbucks Bathroom Policy Is A Terrible Idea [Watch] Katherine Timpf, National Review

TOTALITARIAN IN NYC: De Blasio Issues ‘Cultural Plan’ Linking Museum Funding To Skin Color Ben Shapiro, The Daily Wire

These California Rebels Are Working With Trump, Not Against Him Jarrett Stepman, The Daily Signal

Why Conservatives Shouldn’t Fear That Obama-Netflix Deal [Watch] Christian Toto, Hollywood In Toto

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section