04/02/2017

Purists Kill Whatever They Believe In

Dennis Prager, Investor’s Business Daily

According to The New York Times, 10 moderates, 15 conservatives and eight other Republicans would have voted against the Republican bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare. So, then, 15 or so conservatives made it impossible to pass the bill favored by nearly every other Republican and President Donald Trump. If that is the case, what we have here is another conservative example of purism and principle ruining another major opportunity to do good.

The first purist conservative example were the Never-Trumpers, who believed it was better for Hillary Clinton to be elected president and for the left to have four more years of presidential power than for Trump to win.

There were valid reasons to wonder whether Trump was a conservative and valid reasons to oppose him in the primaries. There were no valid reasons to oppose him in the general election. I said all these things then and have thus far been validated beyond my wildest dreams.

In terms of policy, Trump is a conservative dream. From appointing a conservative to the Supreme Court; to approving the Keystone XL pipeline; to weakening the fanatical, hysterical and tyrannical Environmental Protection Agency; to appointing an ambassador to the United Nations who has moral contempt for that immoral institution; to backing Israel; to seeking to reduce economy-choking regulations on business, all of which are essentially everything conservatives would wish for in a president, Donald Trump is almost too good to be true.

But he's still not good enough for those conservatives who remain Never-Trumpers or the members of the House Freedom Caucus, at least with regard to the bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare that he worked so hard to have passed.

It is quite possible that I and most other conservatives who supported the bill agree with just about every criticism of the bill that House conservatives made. But just as the question in the general election wasn't whether candidate Trump was our ideal, the question now wasn't whether the bill was our ideal. The question during the election was: What will happen if the Democrats and the left win the presidency again? And the question now is: What will happen if the Republicans don't pass a bill favored by all but about 30 Republican congressmen and, most importantly, by President Trump?

But purists don't ask such questions. They live in a somewhat different world than the rest of us who actually agree with them on everything because we don't ask what is ideologically pure and true to our principles. We ask: What is closest to our ideology and our principles?

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Remember That California Single Payer Plan? Yeah… Never Mind. Jazz Shaw, Hot Air

The Missing Ingredient In The Senate’s Obamacare Replacement Sen. Mike Lee, Medium

The Banana Republic Of Illinois Stephen Moore, Investor’s Business Daily

How Obama’s Liberalism Paved The Way For Donald Trump Michael Goodwin, New York Post

Amazon: Anti-Trust Target? [Watch] The Wall Street Journal

Bernie Sanders And His Wife Are Being Investigated By The FBI — Now They’re Lawyering Up Chris Enloe, The Blaze

Liberal Media Livid Over Mattis’ Approach To ISIS: We’re Going to Kill Them All Young Conservatives

Civil Asset Forfeiture: Where Due Process Goes To Die Kevin D. Williamson, National Review

Mystified’: Morning Joe’s Bizarre Music Video Leaves Viewers Speechless [Watch] Jason Miko, Media Equalizer

Democrats, FBI Collaborated On Trump Smear John Hinderaker, Powerline

Trump Derangement Syndrome Has Become The New Plague Roger L. Simon, PJ Media

Record Label Drops Band Over Its ‘Ugly Opinions’ On Safe Spaces, Feminism And Immigration Jillian Kay Melchior, Heat Street

Arsonist Behind Des Moines Mosque Fire Turns Out To Be... Muslim Mark Tapson, Truth Revolt

The Koch Brothers Are Coming After Bad Federal Workers [Watch] Pete Kasperowicz, Washington Examiner

Why The Unlikely Duo Of Adam Carolla And Dennis Prager Are Making A Movie R. J. Moeller, Acculturated

Maxine Waters Bars Trump Supporters From Town Hall Meeting [Watch] Kyle Olson, American Mirror

How The Government Conditions Citizens To Obey Joe Jarvis, The Daily Bell

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.3%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.0%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central May Year-to-Year: 1.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.6%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]