01/12/2017

Why Is Ryan Gosling 'Sexist' For Thanking Mother Of His Children At Golden Globes?

Walter Hudson, PJ Media

You might sincerely wonder whether radical feminists enjoy anything at all. For some, it seems like every occasion or utterance triggers outrage.

Accepting his award for Best Actor in La La Land at the Golden Globes on Sunday, Ryan Gosling singled out his girlfriend Eva Mendes for extra special thanks. He said:

... while I was singing and dancing and playing piano and having one of the best experiences I’ve ever had on a film, my lady was raising our daughter, pregnant with our second and trying to help her brother fight his battle with cancer. If she hadn’t have taken all that on so that I could have this experience, it would surely be someone else up here other than me today.

Sweet, right? Not according to killjoy Narjas Zatat writing for the Independent:

Despite the swooning on social media for his Notebook-esque outpouring, I can’t help but feel that Eva Mendes, an award-winning actor in her own right, took one for the team and provided the emotional labour needed for Gosling to further his own career.

Gosling’s appreciation for his partner, may be genuine but it plays into structural inequality women face in the workplace, least of all Hollywood. Yes, Mendes has agency, and the decision to put her career on the back burner for the sake of her husband’s was hers, but why did she have to make that decision to begin with?

Set aside for the moment that Gosling and Mendes likely have the means to hire whatever help they desire in caring for their growing brood. Let's imagine that they didn't. Let's imagine that Mendes truly "had to" care for her children to afford Gosling the opportunity to work on La La Land.

What's the problem? Is she chained to a post in the kitchen? Is she breastfeeding at gunpoint? Did Gosling somehow coerce or cajole her into taking on a maternal role?

It's safe to say, judging by Gosling's eagerness to thank Mendes for her invaluable contribution to his success, that Mendes indeed chose to contribute. She didn't "have to." She wanted to. It may be difficult for radical feminists like Zatat to understand. But isn't it possible that Mendes made her choice because she loves her boyfriend and their children? Is that not a legitimate, healthy, and even admirable motivation?

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Can Trump Make America Grow Again? The Signs Are Hopeful Andy Puzder, Wall Street Journal

Even With President Trump’s Reductions, Welfare Spending Is Still Growing Oren Cass, City Journal

Who Will Stand Up For Civil Liberties? Alan M. Dershowitz, RealClearPolitics

Pop Singer Ariana Grande Offers To Pay For Funerals Of Manchester Bombing Victims Warner Todd Huston, Young Conservatives

First They Tore Down Confederate Monuments. Next They’ll Come For The Founders. Matt Walsh, The Blaze

That Pope ‘Frown’? More Fake News From Fake Media Nate Madden, Conservative Review

Teachers Get Into Brawl In Front Of Horrified Students [Watch] Lia Eustachewich, New York Post

Rasmussen Reports: President Trump’s Approval Ratings Hit 48% [Watch] Rasmussen Reports

Goodbye ISIS, Hello Losers Scott Adams’ Blog

Wasserman Schultz Threatened Police Chief For Gathering Evidence On Her IT Staffer’s Alleged Crimes [Watch] Luke Rosiak, Daily Caller

Directors Check Actors’ Social Media Before Casting To Make Sure They Don’t Support Trump Christian Toto, Hollywood in Toto

TV Actor Discovers His Inner 'Ron Swanson' After Trying To Start A Business Brittany Hunter, Foundation for Economic Education

Farmer Faces $2.8 Million Fine For Plowing His Own Field Elizabeth Harrington, Washington Free Beacon

Report: Premiums Doubled Once Obamacare Took Full Effect Robert Donachie, Daily Signal

The Free Market Is Diversity’s Best Friend Walter E. Williams, Townhall

Leftists Destroy Female Business Owners' Burrito Stand Because They're White Amanda Prestigiacomo, Daily Wire

The Dark Side Of Paid Parental Leave James Pethokoukis, American Enterprise Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

Cambodia's Deadly Experiment

In the 1950s, students started gathering in Paris. They were reading Karl Marx. They were forming book clubs. They were trying to come up with a better version of society. One that moved away from the division of labor. One that moved away from the capitalism in the big cities that they so despised. ... One of those students would change his name to Pol Pot. He and his colleagues formed a new political party, a takeover in Cambodia. They called themsevles the Khmer Rouge. ... Under Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, one out of four people in that country died in less than four years. 

-- Matt Kibbe,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.4%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.1%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.20% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 10.0%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]