01/12/2017

Why Is Ryan Gosling 'Sexist' For Thanking Mother Of His Children At Golden Globes?

Walter Hudson, PJ Media

You might sincerely wonder whether radical feminists enjoy anything at all. For some, it seems like every occasion or utterance triggers outrage.

Accepting his award for Best Actor in La La Land at the Golden Globes on Sunday, Ryan Gosling singled out his girlfriend Eva Mendes for extra special thanks. He said:

... while I was singing and dancing and playing piano and having one of the best experiences I’ve ever had on a film, my lady was raising our daughter, pregnant with our second and trying to help her brother fight his battle with cancer. If she hadn’t have taken all that on so that I could have this experience, it would surely be someone else up here other than me today.

Sweet, right? Not according to killjoy Narjas Zatat writing for the Independent:

Despite the swooning on social media for his Notebook-esque outpouring, I can’t help but feel that Eva Mendes, an award-winning actor in her own right, took one for the team and provided the emotional labour needed for Gosling to further his own career.

Gosling’s appreciation for his partner, may be genuine but it plays into structural inequality women face in the workplace, least of all Hollywood. Yes, Mendes has agency, and the decision to put her career on the back burner for the sake of her husband’s was hers, but why did she have to make that decision to begin with?

Set aside for the moment that Gosling and Mendes likely have the means to hire whatever help they desire in caring for their growing brood. Let's imagine that they didn't. Let's imagine that Mendes truly "had to" care for her children to afford Gosling the opportunity to work on La La Land.

What's the problem? Is she chained to a post in the kitchen? Is she breastfeeding at gunpoint? Did Gosling somehow coerce or cajole her into taking on a maternal role?

It's safe to say, judging by Gosling's eagerness to thank Mendes for her invaluable contribution to his success, that Mendes indeed chose to contribute. She didn't "have to." She wanted to. It may be difficult for radical feminists like Zatat to understand. But isn't it possible that Mendes made her choice because she loves her boyfriend and their children? Is that not a legitimate, healthy, and even admirable motivation?

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Trump’s Tangle Of Rhetorical Inadequacy Peggy Noonan, The Wall Street Journal

ISIS Claims Responsibility For Barcelona Terrorist Attack [Watch] Iain Burns and Dave Burke, Daily Mail

Who’s Next, George Washington? Harry Stein, City Journal

Leftist Revolutions Have No Limits Max Madison, American Greatness

Venezuela's Starving People Are Now Eating The Zoo Animals Tim Worstall, Forbes.com

Take Down The Statues Of Robert Byrd Daniel John Sobieski, American Thinker

Gary Cohn Is Suddenly The Most Important Person In Washington And On Wall Street [Watch] Jake Novak, CNBC

Shep Smith Claims Republicans Are Unwilling To Defend Trump’s Comments [Watch] Martin Walsh, Western Journalism

Silicon Valley Billionaires Are The New Robber Barons Victor Davis Hanson, National Review

How To Know You’re In A Mass Hysteria Bubble Scott Adams’ Blog

Americans Are Rapidly Descending Into Madness Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg

Privatize The Public Monuments Ryan McMaken, Mises Institute

Chart: Global Income Distributions From 1800 To 2015 Andrew Moran, Economic Collapse News

Lib Media Hiding Dark Secret About Woman Who Toppled Confederate Monument Martin Lioll, Conservative Tribune

So When Will China’s Debt Bubble Finally Blow Up? Wolf Richter, Wolf Street

Missouri Senator: ‘I Hope Trump Is Assassinated!’ Chuck Ross, Daily Caller

What Exactly Fuels The Anticapitalism Of Pope Francis? Helen Andrews, Library of Law and Liberty

Politicians Can't Get Enough Energy Cronyism Veronique de Rugy, Reason

ObamaCare Failure: The Uninsured Are Turning To Over-The-Counter Animal Drugs Brendan Pringle, Red Alert Politics

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

SIGN OUR PETITION

FreeMarket Central

TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE POLITICS.

PASS A HEALTH CARE BILL THAT PUTS PATIENTS FIRST



Americans need a health care bill that serves needs of individuals—not those of Washington and big corporations.

 

Read more

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

When America Was Truly The Land Of Opportunity

For [early immigrants] America was truly the land of opportunity. For the first time in their lives, many were truly free to pursue their own objectives. That freedom released the human energies which created the United States. There were few government programs to turn to and nobody expected them. But also there were few rules and regulations. There were no licenses, no permits, no red tape to restrict them. They found, in fact, a free market, and most of them thrived on it. 

-- Milton Friedman,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.35%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.1%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central July Year-to-Year: 1.63% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.3%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]