01/11/2017

The Human Costs Of Arizona's Minimum Wage Hike

Laurie Roberts, Foundation for Economic Education

Thiis week, Matt Redmann’s employees are getting raises as Arizona’s minimum wage rises to $10 an hour.

It should be cause for celebration.

But there will be a cost and Redmann is hoping his employees won’t be the ones to pay it – with pink slips.

“I’m going to work my butt off to avoid that from happening,” he told me.

Redmann is executive director of Epi-Hab Phoenix Inc. I’m guessing you’ve never heard of it. I hadn’t.

An Opportunity for Those Who Need It

Epi-Hab has been around for 59 years. The non-profit was founded by a group of people, including Dr. John Green and Charles Barrow, who went on to start Barrow Neurological Institute.

The goal is simple: to provide jobs for people who suffer from epilepsy and other challenges that make finding work difficult – or, for a fair number of Redmann’s employees, impossible even.

Epi-Hab doesn’t do fundraisers and it doesn’t get government grants. It survives by providing affordable services – labor intensive work that businesses and government agencies contract with Redmann to provide.

Jobs like packaging and shipping metal frames that transform iPads into cash registers. Like assembling and fulfilling orders for devices that electrify acoustic guitars.

Jobs like cleaning and inspecting meters for Salt River Project. Like assembling tiny valves for a catheter sold by an Arizona manufacturer of medical equipment. That work was being done in Mexico, Redmann tells me, but came back to Arizona two years ago because Epi-Hab could offer a competitive rate.

Redmann’s worried about what happens now that Arizona's minimum wage has rocketed from $8.05/hour to $10. Epi-Hab employs about 30 people and most of them earn less than $10 an hour.

Or they did, until this week.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Reports: North Korean State Media Announced Nuclear Program Shutdown Frances Martel, Breitbart

North Korea Announced The Suspension Of Nuclear And Missile Tests, But What Does That Really Mean? Kemberlee Kaye, Legal Insurrection

The Kevin Williamson Saga Reveals The True Colors Of Journalists Joe Simonson, The Daily Caller

Make the Tax Cuts Permanent [Watch] The Editors, Natinoal Review

Liberal Senators’ Push to Investigate Sinclair Chilling Attempt To Silence Speech Armstrong Williams, The Daily Signal

Delusions Of Justice Joel Kotkin, City Journalo

Barbara Bush's Subversive Secret To Happiness Andrew Ferguson, The Weekly Standard

What Cowardice Looks Like: More On The Philadelphia Starbucks Controversy Christopher DeGroot

How North Korea’s Hackers Became Dangerously Good Timothy W. Martin, The Wall Street Journal

Trump, Don’t Be Fooled, North Korea May Be Laying A Trap For You [Watch] Harry J. Kazianis, Fox News

Are Republicans Draining Or Filling The Swamp? Chris Talgo and Lennie Jarratt, , American Thinker

TOTAL LOSERS: DNC Suing Trump Campaign, Russia, And Wikileaks For Colluding To Win 2016 Election Matt Vespa, Townhall

NY Times Reporter: Male Hillary Clinton Staffers Directed Sexist Comments At Me Alex Griswold, The Washington Free Beacon

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central March Year-to-Year: 2.21% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section