01/11/2017

How Accessible Is Health Care In Your State? Here’s The Ranking.

Mercatus Center

There is broad agreement in the United States that it would be desirable to lower the cost and improve the quality of health care and broaden health insurance coverage. There is much disagreement about how this trio of goals is to be accomplished. The years-long political struggle over the Affordable Care Act (ACA, commonly known as Obamacare) is the most visible manifestation of this divergence of views. The ACA represents one approach to tackling the three goals. Many on the political Left argue for still-more-centralized public-sector control over health care and particularly for a federal single-payer insurance system. Policymakers and commentators on the Right have offered a variety of proposals that, generally speaking, would shift more power to private-sector entities and to states. All these proposals have one thing in common: they assume the key to lower costs and better care lies in reconfiguring the insurance system.

We believe the three goals of healthcare reform cannot be attained by fixating solely, or even primarily, on health insurance reform. States have (and should have) substantial control over the delivery of health care—and not solely or principally in the area of insurance reform. To make maximum use of state powers in improving care, it is vital to have a basis for comparison—to see what works in other states. The Healthcare Openness and Access Project (HOAP) is a set of tools providing state-by-state measures of the flexibility and discretion that patients and providers have in managing health and health care. In other words, how open are each state’s laws and regulations to institutional variation in the delivery of care, and how much access to varying modes of care does this confer on the state’s patients and providers?

[Click through for report]

Read full article



You May Also Like:

An Honest Comey Interview Kimberley A. Strassel, The Wall Street Journal

Democrats Are Getting Desperate As Mueller Stalls Michael Goodwin, New York Post

The $173 Million IRS Tech Team #Failed Adam Andrzejewski, Forbes.com

Melania Trump Brought Two Special Guests In Honor Of Barbara Bush To Her Funeral Jenni Fink, Independent Journal Review

The Most Dangerous Democrat In America Michael Walsh, PJ Media

Eric Holder For Prison, Not President Daniel John Sobieski, American Thinker

18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictions Made Around The Time Of The First Earth Day In 1970. Expect More This Year. Mark J. Perry, Foundation for Economic Education

Gorsuch Strikes A Blow Against The Administrative State George Will, National Review

The Left’s Latest Creepy, Orwellian Education Tactic Karen Efrem and Jane Robbins, American Spectator

This Is How The Government Will Spend Your Taxes In 2018 Brian Riedl, New York Post

Visualizing The Pension Time Bomb: $400 Trillion By 2050 Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

In Defense Of Cash William J. Luther, Reason

#BoycottYeti Movement Erupts After Cooler Maker Ditches NRA Foundation AWR Hawkins, Breitbart News

Hammer Time: Author Brad Thor Vows 2020 Challenge To Trump Sarah Rumpf, RedState

Newly Revealed Government Statistics Hidden From Public Dismantle Liberal Gun Control Narrative Chris Enloe, TheBlaze

Chappaquiddick Rescues The Truth: Kopechne Needn’t Have Died Nathaniel Peters, Library of Law and Liberty

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central March Year-to-Year: 2.21% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section