01/09/2017

Obama Is Using The Russians As An Excuse To Expand Federal Power Over Elections

John Fund, National Review

A decentralized election system makes large-scale hacking nearly impossible. We should keep it that way.

The Obama Administration is leaving office much like the way it came in — by exploiting perceived crises.

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s just-named chief of staff, told a Wall Street Journal conference of top CEOs in November 2008 while his boss was still president-elect. Since then a slew of constitutionally dubious executive orders, presidential emergencies, and rushed legislation have characterized the Obama presidency. Now he is leaving office by issuing a blizzard of “midnight regulations” and edicts.

One of the most troublesome came last Friday and gave the federal government the power to begin centralizing our election systems. The Constitution explicitly gives states the power to set the “times, manner and places of holding elections.”

But Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson used the excuse of Friday’s release of a report on Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee to declare that state and local voting systems will be designated as “pieces of critical infrastructure” so that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can protect them from hackers.

His move — coming just 15 days before President Obama leaves office — led many experts to question both its wisdom and its constitutionality. “While the federal government has the general power to protect the nation’s cyber infrastructure, it cannot intrude into areas of state sovereignty without clear constitutional mandate,” John Yoo, a law professor at UC Berkeley, told CNSNews.com.

“There is no federal power to control or secure elections. Each state administers its own elections, restricted only by constitutional protections for voting rights,” agreed Illya Shapiro, senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute. “It may make sense for states to request federal support here, but it would set a dangerous precedent for a federal agency to unilaterally take over state electoral processes.”

Secretary Johnson’s decision sparked outrage from many of those who are most knowledgeable about our election system — the 50 secretaries of state who, along with local officials, run the election process. Even Johnson admitted that “many of them are opposed to this designation.” And how.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Did Atomic Graft Help The Kremlin Capture 20 Percent Of U.S. Uranium? Deroy Murdock, National Review

FBN’s Dobbs: Uranium One ‘May Well Turn Out To Be The Biggest Scandal In American Political History’ [Watch] Breitbart TV

Entitled Nation The Editors, The Weekly Standard

Rand Paul Blasts Fellow GOP Members For Voting AGAINST Cutting $43 Billion In Spending Brandon Morse, Red State

Antifa Fight Club: Teaching The Far Left To Punch And Shoot [Watch] John Sexton, Hot Air

Failure On Tax Cuts Really Could Tank The Markets Charles Gasparino, New York Post

Feminism’s Experiment Against Common Sense George Neumayr, The American Spectator

Why Professional Culture Warriors Should Get A Real Job Mark Judge, Acculturated

Students Love Trump's Tax Plan...When Told It's Bernie's Cabot Philips, Campus Reform

Alabamians Outraged As Civil Asset Forfeitures Soar Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge

A Gold-Backed Yuan? Analysts Concede It Could Be A ‘Game-Changer’ Doug French, Economic Collapse News

Antonin Scalia’s Son Speaks About His Father’s Legacy Domnic Lynch, The Federalist

University Students Given Trigger Warnings About Shakespeare – In England Mike LaChance, Legal Insurrection

Tax Reform: Ending Forced Retirement Withdrawals Chris Edwards, Cato Institute

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Search

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

When America Was Truly The Land Of Opportunity

For [early immigrants] America was truly the land of opportunity. For the first time in their lives, many were truly free to pursue their own objectives. That freedom released the human energies which created the United States. There were few government programs to turn to and nobody expected them. But also there were few rules and regulations. There were no licenses, no permits, no red tape to restrict them. They found, in fact, a free market, and most of them thrived on it. 

-- Milton Friedman,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.44%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 22.2%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central September Year-to-Year: 1.94% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.7%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]