10/11/2018

John Fund: Winners And Losers In The Kavanaugh Confirmation Fight

John Fund, Fox News

In assessing who comes out ahead or behind after the Kavanaugh firestorm, let’s acknowledge that in some ways we don’t know: the midterm elections a month from now have become more chaotic and uncertain as the Kavanaugh hearing has added fuel to the already raging partisan flames.

The election impact may be a split outcome.  In four states where Democratic Senators are running for re-election, Trump and his Supreme Court pick are popular.  Senators Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Jon Tester of Montana may go down to defeat because the intensity of their liberal base’s opposition prevented them from moving to the center and voting for Kavanaugh.  Last year, both Donnelly and Heitkamp, for example, voted for Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first Supreme Court choice.

For his part, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell thinks the excesses of the Kavanaugh opposition are a “great political gift.”  He told The Hill newspaper on Saturday that “The tactics have energized our base. I want to thank the mob, because they’ve done the one thing we were having trouble doing, which was energizing our base.”

But there is a flip side of the political impact. The confirmation of Kavanaugh could inflame suburban women, who will play a key role in deciding whether or not the GOP can defend 25 seats won by Hillary Clinton in 2016.  Take Southern California, where Democrats are currently leading or tied in four Orange County districts Clinton carried but which also elected a Republican in 2016.

A Democratic poll released Wednesday found that women in the four Orange County seats said they would be less likely to vote Republican if Kavanaugh was confirmed.

While there is a lot that’s uncertain about the Kavanaugh fallout, we can draw some conclusions on who winners or losers are:

Read full article


Tags:


You May Also Like:

The Boring Supreme Court Case That Could Help Make America Great Again David French, National Review

Comey, Careless And Corrupt George Neumayr, The American Spectator

The Hoax Of 'Climate Change' Allison Nichols, American Thinker

Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Gains Big Backer But Shows Signs Of Falling Apart Chris White, The Daily Caller

Thomas Sowell Explains The Economics Of Discrimination David Weinberger, The Federalist

The Bush Tax Betrayal Stephen Moore, Townhall

Nebraska Elementary School Principal Bans Everything Related To Christmas; EVERYTHING Alex Parker, RedState

Your Phone Is Tracking Your Every Movement. Here's What You Can Do About It Phil Baker, PJ Media

Harvard Study: "Gender Wage Gap" Explained Entirely By Work Choices Of Men And Women John Phelan, FEE

VICTORY: Radio Station Lifts Ban On 'Baby, It's Cold Outside' After Overwhelmingly Positive Poll Paul Bois, The Daily Wire

I’m A Jew. Here’s Why I Support Saying ‘Merry Christmas.’ Dennis Prager, The Daily Signal

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

4,000 Years Of Price Control

Tablets, said to be 200 years older than the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi ... show that the ancient kingdom of Eshnunna had wage control and price control. The news ought not to have come as a surprise. For the code of Hammurabi itself (unearthed in 1902), which was promulgated earlier than 2000 B.C., fixed prices, wages, interest rates, and fees. This makes price control at least about 4,000 years old. ...

 

Ironically, it is those who now wish to return to this ancient totalitarian device who are fondest of calling themselves “progressives.” They are also fond of saying that those who believe in economic liberty “are living in the nineteenth century.” These controlists have yet to learn that they themselves are still living, as the discoveries in Babylonia attest, in the nineteenth century—B.C.!

-- Henry Hazlitt,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.05%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central November Year-to-Year: 2.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section