The "Trade Deficit" Isn't A Problem, But It Shows A Problem

Nathan Lewis, Forbes.com

Trade issues have again come to the forefront, and with them all the same old arguments that haven’t changed much over the decades. I want to take up the topic of trade, and trade-related issues, without treading the same old ruts that are not very productive today.

Not to be too coy about it, I am mostly on the free-trade side, but I think that the “economic nationalists” have some valid points that should be discussed. However, these valid points typically come wrapped in a series of tired old fallacies, which the free-trader types justifiably dismiss.

One valid point, as I see it, is related to foreign competition, particularly competition from the world’s low-wage countries. Nobody seems to be terribly concerned about competition with developed Europe or Canada. Another valid point is the issue of floating currencies, which introduce arbitrary winners and losers. There are related issues regarding immigration and domestic investment and capital creation. The free-trader types mostly ignore all of these issues, instead repeating a series of learned nostrums in response to every situation. Even if we decide that free trade is a better solution, we should make that decision based on some investigation, rather than asserting that it must always be the best solution in every circumstance, because … it just is.

First of all: the “trade deficit.” This is more properly expanded to the current-account deficit, which includes both goods and services, and also net investment income. Commonly, a current-account surplus is perceived as “good,” and a current-account deficit is “bad.” This implies that countries are in an eternal war with each other – no country can run a “good” surplus unless another runs a “bad” deficit, by definition. But isn’t trade supposed to be mutually-beneficial cooperation? In other words – everyone’s a winner? Since all trade is undertaken voluntarily – each party in the transaction perceives itself to be better off – it would seem that trade must be mutually beneficial.

Read full article

You May Also Like:

The Boring Supreme Court Case That Could Help Make America Great Again David French, National Review

Comey, Careless And Corrupt George Neumayr, The American Spectator

The Hoax Of 'Climate Change' Allison Nichols, American Thinker

Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Gains Big Backer But Shows Signs Of Falling Apart Chris White, The Daily Caller

Thomas Sowell Explains The Economics Of Discrimination David Weinberger, The Federalist

The Bush Tax Betrayal Stephen Moore, Townhall

Nebraska Elementary School Principal Bans Everything Related To Christmas; EVERYTHING Alex Parker, RedState

Your Phone Is Tracking Your Every Movement. Here's What You Can Do About It Phil Baker, PJ Media

Harvard Study: "Gender Wage Gap" Explained Entirely By Work Choices Of Men And Women John Phelan, FEE

VICTORY: Radio Station Lifts Ban On 'Baby, It's Cold Outside' After Overwhelmingly Positive Poll Paul Bois, The Daily Wire

I’m A Jew. Here’s Why I Support Saying ‘Merry Christmas.’ Dennis Prager, The Daily Signal

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference


In Search Of History

4,000 Years Of Price Control

Tablets, said to be 200 years older than the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi ... show that the ancient kingdom of Eshnunna had wage control and price control. The news ought not to have come as a surprise. For the code of Hammurabi itself (unearthed in 1902), which was promulgated earlier than 2000 B.C., fixed prices, wages, interest rates, and fees. This makes price control at least about 4,000 years old. ...


Ironically, it is those who now wish to return to this ancient totalitarian device who are fondest of calling themselves “progressives.” They are also fond of saying that those who believe in economic liberty “are living in the nineteenth century.” These controlists have yet to learn that they themselves are still living, as the discoveries in Babylonia attest, in the nineteenth century—B.C.!

-- Henry Hazlitt,

Shadow Stats Snapshot

FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.05%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central November Year-to-Year: 2.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]