05/16/2018

Old Labour, Old Danger

Oliver Wiseman, Weekly Standard

Harold Wilson, British prime minister in the 1960s and 1970s, once said that the Labour party he led owed more to Methodism than to Karl Marx. Those at the top of the party today do not share their predecessor’s view.

Before Jeremy Corbyn was unexpectedly elected Labour leader in 2015, he led a career of far-left obscurity, catching the attention of the public now and then only thanks to his support for Hamas, Hugo Chávez, and anyone lined up on his side in what he sees as a global battle against capitalism and the West. Three years later, he is the bookmakers’ favorite to be Britain’s next leader.

But for all that Corbyn has poisoned British politics—most recently by allowing the emergence of a rabid anti-Semitism in his party’s rank and file—he isn’t the biggest threat to the country. The man who would take the reins of the British economy were Corbyn to become prime minister is far more dangerous.

John McDonnell is Corbyn’s closest political ally. As shadow chancellor of the exchequer, he is the second most powerful man on the British left. And he sees the Labour party’s intellectual inheritance a little differently from Harold Wilson.

On May 5, when the rest of London was outside enjoying the spring heat wave, McDonnell was inside a drab lecture hall at the University of London, delivering a speech on “Marxism as a Force for Change Today.” It was 200 years to the day since the birth of Karl Marx.

Just a few hundred yards from the British Museum reading room where the political philosopher committed many of his dangerous and disproven ideas to the page, earnest and aging Marxists gathered to mark the date. The speakers included representatives from the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation of Berlin, the head of the Marxism department at China’s Academy of Social Sciences, and the general secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), with an assortment of left-wing sociologists making up the numbers. McDonnell’s speech was the main event.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

New Study Ranks US High In Economic Freedom, But Trump’s Tariffs Could Change That Alexander Hammond, Washington Examiner

Does Midterm History Really Augur Big GOP Losses? David Catron, The American Spectator

Tucker Carlson: In Their Efforts To Fight Trump, Democrats Have Become What They Said They Hated Tucker Carlson, Fox News

'Blue Wave' Ebbing? Dem Advantages Offset By Strong Economy Rick Moran, PJ Media

Actual Pocahontas Descendant Calls Out Elizabeth Warren Nate Church, Breitbart

Warren Is A Fraud Ben Shapiro, National Review

6 Political Scandals The Press Doesn't Want You To Know About Investor's Business Daily

The Ratings Are In, And They’re Important: Left-Wing The Conners Vs. Right-Wing Last Man Standing Alex Parker, RedState

Mattis: China’s Island Militarization Continues Bill Gertz, The Washington Free Beacon

One-Party Rule Has Left New York In A Sorry State Michael Goodwin, New York Post

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

4,000 Years Of Price Control

Tablets, said to be 200 years older than the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi ... show that the ancient kingdom of Eshnunna had wage control and price control. The news ought not to have come as a surprise. For the code of Hammurabi itself (unearthed in 1902), which was promulgated earlier than 2000 B.C., fixed prices, wages, interest rates, and fees. This makes price control at least about 4,000 years old. ...

 

Ironically, it is those who now wish to return to this ancient totalitarian device who are fondest of calling themselves “progressives.” They are also fond of saying that those who believe in economic liberty “are living in the nineteenth century.” These controlists have yet to learn that they themselves are still living, as the discoveries in Babylonia attest, in the nineteenth century—B.C.!

-- Henry Hazlitt,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.05%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central September Year-to-Year: 2.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section