05/16/2018

How Identity Politics Is Harming The Sciences

Heather Mac Donald, City Journal

Identity politics has engulfed the humanities and social sciences on American campuses; now it is taking over the hard sciences. The STEM fields—science, technology, engineering, and math—are under attack for being insufficiently “diverse.” The pressure to increase the representation of females, blacks, and Hispanics comes from the federal government, university administrators, and scientific societies themselves. That pressure is changing how science is taught and how scientific qualifications are evaluated. The results will be disastrous for scientific innovation and for American competitiveness.

Ascientist at UCLA reports: “All across the country the big question now in STEM is: how can we promote more women and minorities by ‘changing’ (i.e., lowering) the requirements we had previously set for graduate level study?” Mathematical problem-solving is being deemphasized in favor of more qualitative group projects; the pace of undergraduate physics education is being slowed down so that no one gets left behind.

The National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency that funds university research, is consumed by diversity ideology. Progress in science, it argues, requires a “diverse STEM workforce.” Programs to boost diversity in STEM pour forth from its coffers in wild abundance. The NSF jump-started the implicit-bias industry in the 1990s by underwriting the development of the implicit association test (IAT). (The IAT purports to reveal a subject’s unconscious biases by measuring the speed with which he associates minority faces with positive or negative words; see “Are We All Unconscious Racists?,” Autumn 2017.) Since then, the NSF has continued to dump millions of dollars into implicit-bias activism. In July 2017, it awarded $1 million to the University of New Hampshire and two other institutions to develop a “bias-awareness intervention tool.” Another $2 million that same month went to the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University to “remediate microaggressions and implicit biases” in engineering classrooms.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

When Carter Page Met Stefan Halper The Wall Street Journal

Lying Liar James Clapper Just Lied Again About His Previous Lies About NSA Spying [Watch] Bre Payton, The Federalist

Tinker, Tailor, Clapper, Carter, Downer, Halper, Spy Mark Steyn, SteynOnline.com

Texas Laps California In Job And Population Growth Chuck DeVore, Forbes.com

HOW TO DESTROY A MAJOR CITY: One Week After Passing Massive Job Tax, Seattle Democrats Consider Huge Property Tax Increase Ben Shapiro, Daily Wire

Honest FBI Agents Step Forward: Want To Testify Against Their Deep State Masters Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit

NFL Adopts Policy To Fine Teams If Players And Personnel Don't Stand For National Anthem Kathleen Joyce, Fox News

How Junk Science Sends Innocent People To Jail [Watch] John Stossel, Rasmussen Reports

The Obamas’ Netflix Deal Proves It’s Time To Stop Paying Ex-Presidents Jonathan S. Tobin, New York Post

Let The Farm Bill Stay Dead Michael Tanner, National Review

Larry Elder: Kanye, The Media, And New Conservatives [Watch] Rubin Report

Right To Try Passes House, Trump Expected To Sign Mary Lou Lang, Washington Free Beacon

Tomi Lahren Viciously Assaulted At Brunch With Mom [Watch] Matt, Political Insider

You Have To Work!': Judge Lays Down The Law On 30-Year-Old Who Refused To Leave Parent's House [Watch] Jenni Fink, Independent Journal Review

Firefighter Earned $300K In Overtime By Working More Hours Than Actually Exist Eric Boehm, Reason

Welfare By Another Name James Rickards, Daily Reckoning

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 3.93%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central April Year-to-Year: 2.46% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section