04/16/2018

Trump Action Will Reduce Immigrant Medicaid Enrollment

David Catron, The American Spectator

Updated immigration rules discourage exploitation of health programs.

Many Americans are angry about the large percentage of their tax dollars being doled out to immigrants in the form of public assistance, particularly at a time when federal budget deficits are skyrocketing. This is no racist hobgoblin conjured up by “deplorable” knuckle-draggers, as Hillary Clinton would have it. Medicaid, for example, costs the taxpayers $565 billion annually and, according to a widely cited 2017 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 46 percent of immigrant households receive Medicaid benefits. The Trump administration is therefore taking action to reduce the number of non-citizens who enroll in Medicaid.

Specifically, the President has instructed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to issue new guidelines that would broaden the government’s definition of “public charge” as it pertains to non-citizens residing in the United States or applying for resident status. This definition matters because, if an immigrant has a high probability of becoming a public charge (i.e. dependent on welfare to live), it should be difficult for him to gain approval for remaining in the country. In other words, the primary goal of the Trump administration is to make sure that immigrants are self-sufficient rather than burdens on the taxpayers. DHS puts it as follows in its proposed rule:

DHS seeks to ensure that aliens who are subject to the public charge inadmissibility ground and who are admitted to the United States or who adjust their status to that of a lawful permanent resident are self-sufficient… any alien is inadmissible if at the time of an application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status, he or she is likely at any time to become a public charge.

Under the old rules, which were put in place by the Clinton administration, the determination that an immigrant would probably become a public charge was based on a very narrow range of criteria. They primarily include whether an immigrant receives “cash assistance,” such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or General Assistance (GA). They do not include much more pervasive and expensive “non-cash” assistance, including health care programs paid for or subsidized by federal or state funds, including Medicaid and even Obamacare. Thus, DHS recommends expanding the list of criteria as follows:

Read full article



You May Also Like:

Reports: North Korean State Media Announced Nuclear Program Shutdown Frances Martel, Breitbart

North Korea Announced The Suspension Of Nuclear And Missile Tests, But What Does That Really Mean? Kemberlee Kaye, Legal Insurrection

The Kevin Williamson Saga Reveals The True Colors Of Journalists Joe Simonson, The Daily Caller

Make the Tax Cuts Permanent [Watch] The Editors, Natinoal Review

Liberal Senators’ Push to Investigate Sinclair Chilling Attempt To Silence Speech Armstrong Williams, The Daily Signal

Delusions Of Justice Joel Kotkin, City Journalo

Barbara Bush's Subversive Secret To Happiness Andrew Ferguson, The Weekly Standard

What Cowardice Looks Like: More On The Philadelphia Starbucks Controversy Christopher DeGroot

How North Korea’s Hackers Became Dangerously Good Timothy W. Martin, The Wall Street Journal

Trump, Don’t Be Fooled, North Korea May Be Laying A Trap For You [Watch] Harry J. Kazianis, Fox News

Are Republicans Draining Or Filling The Swamp? Chris Talgo and Lennie Jarratt, , American Thinker

TOTAL LOSERS: DNC Suing Trump Campaign, Russia, And Wikileaks For Colluding To Win 2016 Election Matt Vespa, Townhall

NY Times Reporter: Male Hillary Clinton Staffers Directed Sexist Comments At Me Alex Griswold, The Washington Free Beacon

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central March Year-to-Year: 2.21% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section