04/16/2018

Trump Action Will Reduce Immigrant Medicaid Enrollment

David Catron, The American Spectator

Updated immigration rules discourage exploitation of health programs.

Many Americans are angry about the large percentage of their tax dollars being doled out to immigrants in the form of public assistance, particularly at a time when federal budget deficits are skyrocketing. This is no racist hobgoblin conjured up by “deplorable” knuckle-draggers, as Hillary Clinton would have it. Medicaid, for example, costs the taxpayers $565 billion annually and, according to a widely cited 2017 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 46 percent of immigrant households receive Medicaid benefits. The Trump administration is therefore taking action to reduce the number of non-citizens who enroll in Medicaid.

Specifically, the President has instructed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to issue new guidelines that would broaden the government’s definition of “public charge” as it pertains to non-citizens residing in the United States or applying for resident status. This definition matters because, if an immigrant has a high probability of becoming a public charge (i.e. dependent on welfare to live), it should be difficult for him to gain approval for remaining in the country. In other words, the primary goal of the Trump administration is to make sure that immigrants are self-sufficient rather than burdens on the taxpayers. DHS puts it as follows in its proposed rule:

DHS seeks to ensure that aliens who are subject to the public charge inadmissibility ground and who are admitted to the United States or who adjust their status to that of a lawful permanent resident are self-sufficient… any alien is inadmissible if at the time of an application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status, he or she is likely at any time to become a public charge.

Under the old rules, which were put in place by the Clinton administration, the determination that an immigrant would probably become a public charge was based on a very narrow range of criteria. They primarily include whether an immigrant receives “cash assistance,” such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or General Assistance (GA). They do not include much more pervasive and expensive “non-cash” assistance, including health care programs paid for or subsidized by federal or state funds, including Medicaid and even Obamacare. Thus, DHS recommends expanding the list of criteria as follows:

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The Helsinki Summit Will Further Derange American Politics Michael Brendan Dougherty, National Review

The Helsinki Hysteria New York Sun

Correction: Trump Did Not Absolve Russians Of Meddling Tom Trinko, American Thinker

People Are Worrying The Labor Market Is Too Good Andy Puzder, The Wall Street Journal

Schumer Raises 'Possibility That Putin Holds Damaging Information Over President Trump’ [Watch] Susan Jones, CNSNews

#WalkAway Founder Brandon Straka Denied Service At Adorama Camera Store [Watch] Jessica Chasmar, Washington Times

Report: Uber Driver Dumps 6 GOP Volunteers At Random Gas Station, Says ‘Welcome To The Resistance’ Sarah Taylor, TheBlaze

Democrat Congressman Calls For A Military Coup Streiff, RedState

There's Never An Excuse For Protectionism, So Stop Excusing It John Tamny, RealClearMarkets

California’s Mortgage Fraud The Wall Street Journal

RNC Doubles DNC Fundraising Ahead Of Midterms Matt, Political Insider

Beware Bernie Sanders's Unsound Economic Arguments Ahmed Barakat, Foundation for Economic Education

Democrats Begin To Turn On Ocasio-Cortez: ‘Meteors Fizz Out’ Joseph Curl, Daily Wire

A Guaranteed Income Would Undermine The Social Virtues Of Work John O. McGinnis, Library of Law and Liberty

Automation Isn’t Nearly As Disruptive As You Might Think Tim Worstall, CapX

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

4,000 Years Of Price Control

Tablets, said to be 200 years older than the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi ... show that the ancient kingdom of Eshnunna had wage control and price control. The news ought not to have come as a surprise. For the code of Hammurabi itself (unearthed in 1902), which was promulgated earlier than 2000 B.C., fixed prices, wages, interest rates, and fees. This makes price control at least about 4,000 years old. ...

 

Ironically, it is those who now wish to return to this ancient totalitarian device who are fondest of calling themselves “progressives.” They are also fond of saying that those who believe in economic liberty “are living in the nineteenth century.” These controlists have yet to learn that they themselves are still living, as the discoveries in Babylonia attest, in the nineteenth century—B.C.!

-- Henry Hazlitt,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.05%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central June Year-to-Year: 2.80% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section