04/16/2018

Scott Pruitt Isn’t Anti-Science

John Tierney, National Review

Imagine if the head of a federal agency announced a new policy for its scientific research: From now on, the agency would no longer allow its studies to be reviewed and challenged by independent scientists, and its researchers would not share the data on which their conclusions were based. The response from scientists and journalists would be outrage. By refusing peer review from outsiders, the agency would be rejecting a fundamental scientific tradition. By not sharing data with other researchers, it would be violating a standard transparency requirement at leading scientific journals. If a Republican official did such a thing, you’d expect to hear denunciations of this latest offensive in the “Republican war on science.”

That’s the accusation being hurled at Scott Pruitt, the Republican who heads the Environmental Protection Agency. But Pruitt hasn’t done anything to discourage peer review. In fact, he’s done the opposite: He has called for the use of more independent experts to review the EPA’s research and has just announced that the agency would rely only on studies for which data are available to be shared. Yet Democratic officials and liberal journalists have denounced these moves as an “attack on science,” and Democrats have cited them (along with accusations of ethical violations) in their campaign to force Pruitt out of his job.

How could “the party of science,” as Democrats like to call themselves, be opposed to transparency and peer review? Because better scientific oversight would make it tougher for the EPA to justify its costly regulations. To environmentalists, rigorous scientific protocols are fine in theory, but not in practice if they interfere with the green political agenda. As usual, the real war on science is the one waged from the left.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The Helsinki Summit Will Further Derange American Politics Michael Brendan Dougherty, National Review

The Helsinki Hysteria New York Sun

Correction: Trump Did Not Absolve Russians Of Meddling Tom Trinko, American Thinker

People Are Worrying The Labor Market Is Too Good Andy Puzder, The Wall Street Journal

Schumer Raises 'Possibility That Putin Holds Damaging Information Over President Trump’ [Watch] Susan Jones, CNSNews

#WalkAway Founder Brandon Straka Denied Service At Adorama Camera Store [Watch] Jessica Chasmar, Washington Times

Report: Uber Driver Dumps 6 GOP Volunteers At Random Gas Station, Says ‘Welcome To The Resistance’ Sarah Taylor, TheBlaze

Democrat Congressman Calls For A Military Coup Streiff, RedState

There's Never An Excuse For Protectionism, So Stop Excusing It John Tamny, RealClearMarkets

California’s Mortgage Fraud The Wall Street Journal

RNC Doubles DNC Fundraising Ahead Of Midterms Matt, Political Insider

Beware Bernie Sanders's Unsound Economic Arguments Ahmed Barakat, Foundation for Economic Education

Democrats Begin To Turn On Ocasio-Cortez: ‘Meteors Fizz Out’ Joseph Curl, Daily Wire

A Guaranteed Income Would Undermine The Social Virtues Of Work John O. McGinnis, Library of Law and Liberty

Automation Isn’t Nearly As Disruptive As You Might Think Tim Worstall, CapX

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

4,000 Years Of Price Control

Tablets, said to be 200 years older than the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi ... show that the ancient kingdom of Eshnunna had wage control and price control. The news ought not to have come as a surprise. For the code of Hammurabi itself (unearthed in 1902), which was promulgated earlier than 2000 B.C., fixed prices, wages, interest rates, and fees. This makes price control at least about 4,000 years old. ...

 

Ironically, it is those who now wish to return to this ancient totalitarian device who are fondest of calling themselves “progressives.” They are also fond of saying that those who believe in economic liberty “are living in the nineteenth century.” These controlists have yet to learn that they themselves are still living, as the discoveries in Babylonia attest, in the nineteenth century—B.C.!

-- Henry Hazlitt,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.05%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central June Year-to-Year: 2.80% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section