12/07/2017

Forced Union Dues Fund Labor Union Politics

Trey Kovacs, Competitive Enterprise Institute

Today, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) submitted a brief in Janus v AFSCME, Council 31, a case before the United States Supreme Court. The question at hand is whether the First Amendment allows the government to force public employees to financially assist a union they do not support. The plaintiff in the case is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977), which permits unions to collect compulsory dues, or in some cases, agency fees.

CEI’s brief dispels the myth that forced union dues are only spent on union representational activity. Despite past U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have placed restrictions on how labor unions may use forced dues, “public-sector unions have demonstrated unbridled creativity in channeling the fees paid by non-members to fund a range of ideological activities as wide as any political party’s.”

In Abood, the plaintiffs argued that a “substantial part” of the forced union dues paid to the labor unions go toward supporting activity that was “political, professional, scientific, and religious in nature of which Plaintiffs do not approve, and in which they will have no voice.”

And the plaintiffs in Abood were, unfortunately, correct.

CEI’s brief puts forth a laundry list of political activity conducted by public-sector unions that was funded by forced union dues. The labor union is the case, an AFSCME affiliate, used non-member agency payments for advocacy on issues like:

  • Right-to-work statutes
  • The minimum wage
  • Gun control
  • D.C. state-hood
  • “AFSCME FOR HILLARY”
  • Instructed members on political organizing and voter registration

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The FCC Restores Internet Freedom And Stops Government Gatekeepers Grover Norquist, Washington Examiner

The Bad Old Days Of The Internet And Other Myths Of Net Neutrality Harold Furchtgott-Roth, Forbes.com

What’s Next For The Restoring Internet Freedom Order Daniel Lyons, American Enterprise Institute

Comey Edits Revealed: Remarks On Clinton Probe Were Watered Down, Documents Show [Watch] Judson Berger, Fox News

Moore’s Law: Kooky Candidates Lose Karl Rove, The Wall Street Journal

Yes, Investigate The Investigators National Review

Republican Civil War Could Hand Senate To Democrats Scott Rasmussen, Townhall

Ex-Officer: Clintons 'Systematically Destroyed' Secret Service's Integrity Daniel Bates, Daily Mail

MERRY AGAIN: Retail Sales Blow Away Expectations John Carney, Breitbart News

When Donald Met Kirsten Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal

The State Department Is Boycotting Trump’s Jerusalem Policy Seth Lipsky, New York Post

California’s Infrastructure Is Crumbling (When It’s Not Burning) Steven Greenhut, American Spectator

Obama AG Eric Holder Threatens GOP Congress: ‘Any Attempt To Remove Bob Mueller Will Not Be Tolerated’ Kristinn Taylor, Gateway Pundit

Speaker Paul Ryan Reportedly Considering Retirement After Midterm Elections Brandon Morse, RedState

SCOTUS And The Spy In Your Pocket Mark J. Fitzgibbons, American Thinker

I Have Seen London’s Future And It Is Caracas Theodore Dalrymple, Library of Law and Liberty

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.12%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central November Year-to-Year: 2.04% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.8%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]