12/07/2017

Forced Union Dues Fund Labor Union Politics

Trey Kovacs, Competitive Enterprise Institute

Today, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) submitted a brief in Janus v AFSCME, Council 31, a case before the United States Supreme Court. The question at hand is whether the First Amendment allows the government to force public employees to financially assist a union they do not support. The plaintiff in the case is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977), which permits unions to collect compulsory dues, or in some cases, agency fees.

CEI’s brief dispels the myth that forced union dues are only spent on union representational activity. Despite past U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have placed restrictions on how labor unions may use forced dues, “public-sector unions have demonstrated unbridled creativity in channeling the fees paid by non-members to fund a range of ideological activities as wide as any political party’s.”

In Abood, the plaintiffs argued that a “substantial part” of the forced union dues paid to the labor unions go toward supporting activity that was “political, professional, scientific, and religious in nature of which Plaintiffs do not approve, and in which they will have no voice.”

And the plaintiffs in Abood were, unfortunately, correct.

CEI’s brief puts forth a laundry list of political activity conducted by public-sector unions that was funded by forced union dues. The labor union is the case, an AFSCME affiliate, used non-member agency payments for advocacy on issues like:

  • Right-to-work statutes
  • The minimum wage
  • Gun control
  • D.C. state-hood
  • “AFSCME FOR HILLARY”
  • Instructed members on political organizing and voter registration

Read full article



You May Also Like:

New Study Ranks US High In Economic Freedom, But Trump’s Tariffs Could Change That Alexander Hammond, Washington Examiner

Does Midterm History Really Augur Big GOP Losses? David Catron, The American Spectator

Tucker Carlson: In Their Efforts To Fight Trump, Democrats Have Become What They Said They Hated Tucker Carlson, Fox News

'Blue Wave' Ebbing? Dem Advantages Offset By Strong Economy Rick Moran, PJ Media

Actual Pocahontas Descendant Calls Out Elizabeth Warren Nate Church, Breitbart

Warren Is A Fraud Ben Shapiro, National Review

6 Political Scandals The Press Doesn't Want You To Know About Investor's Business Daily

The Ratings Are In, And They’re Important: Left-Wing The Conners Vs. Right-Wing Last Man Standing Alex Parker, RedState

Mattis: China’s Island Militarization Continues Bill Gertz, The Washington Free Beacon

One-Party Rule Has Left New York In A Sorry State Michael Goodwin, New York Post

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

4,000 Years Of Price Control

Tablets, said to be 200 years older than the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi ... show that the ancient kingdom of Eshnunna had wage control and price control. The news ought not to have come as a surprise. For the code of Hammurabi itself (unearthed in 1902), which was promulgated earlier than 2000 B.C., fixed prices, wages, interest rates, and fees. This makes price control at least about 4,000 years old. ...

 

Ironically, it is those who now wish to return to this ancient totalitarian device who are fondest of calling themselves “progressives.” They are also fond of saying that those who believe in economic liberty “are living in the nineteenth century.” These controlists have yet to learn that they themselves are still living, as the discoveries in Babylonia attest, in the nineteenth century—B.C.!

-- Henry Hazlitt,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.05%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.5%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central September Year-to-Year: 2.87% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section