10/12/2017

If You Can Pay For Aspirin, You Can Pay For Birth Control

Jeff Jacoby, Townhall

IT HAS BEEN 52 years since the Supreme Court ruled, in Griswold v. Connecticut, that government may not ban anyone from using contraceptives. The freedom to use birth control is protected by the Constitution's "fundamental right" to privacy. That freedom is a matter of settled law and hasn't been challenged in the slightest by President Trump or his administration.

But you wouldn't know that from the hysteria that erupted when the White House last week acted to uphold the conscience claims of employers who object to funding some types of contraception on sincere moral or religious grounds.

"The Trump administration just took direct aim at birth control coverage for 62 million women," stormed Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood. On Twitter, Hillary Clinton accused Trump of showing "blatant disregard for medicine, science, & every woman's right to make her own health decisions." Elizabeth Warren, denouncing "this attack on basic health care," claimed that the GOP's top priority is to deprive women of birth control. "News flash to Republicans," Warren sneered. "The year is 2017, not 1917."

News flash to Warren, et al.: There is no attack on health care, and no one in America is being deprived of birth control. You are losing nothing but the power to force nuns to pay for your oral contraceptives. As a matter of common decency, you should be ashamed of demanding something so outrageous.

Read full article



You May Also Like:

The Wages Of Tax Reform Are Going To America’s Workers Kevin Hassett, The Wall Street Journal

Can Larry Kudlow Please Explain To Genius Businessman Trump How Online Sales Taxes Work? Carl Arbogast, RedState

Why Free Trade, Not Tariffs, Actually Increases American Jobs David Weinberger, The Federalist

Thomas Sowell On Facts And Free Speech (Pt. 1) [Watch] Rubin Report

Liberal College Professor Calls Barbara Bush ‘Racist,’ Cheers Her Death Derek Hunter, Daily Caller

Facebook’s Use Of Data May Annoy You, But IRS Handling Of Your Sensitive Information Is Truly Chilling J.D. Tuccille, Reason

The French Revolution Could Offer A Lens On Thermidor Of Trump Conrad Black, New York Sun

Surprised By Neil Gorsuch's Ruling? You Weren’t Paying Attention. Ilya Shapiro, Washington Examiner

CNN Washes Out Its Own Role In Outing Hannity's Legal Chat With Michael Cohen Tim Graham, mrcNewsBusters

‘Little Pink House’: When The Government Grabs Your Home Nick Sibilla, New York Post

The Changes That Made California Become A Liberal Fiasco Jarrett Stepman, Daily Signal

The New York Times Best-Seller List: Another Reason Americans Don't Trust The Media Dennis Prager, Townhall

Kroger Announces More Benefits For Employees Thanks To Tax Reform Karen Townsend, Hot Air

City Inspector Cites Business Flying U.S. Military Flags. Then She's Confronted By A Veteran. [Watch] Hank Berrien, Daily Wire

Minnesota Public Radio: Anatomy Of A Smear John Hinderaker, Powerline Blog

Time For Conservatives To Deconstruct Academia Malcolm A. Kline, Accuracy in Academia

Explaining The New Illiberal Liberalism John O. McGinnis, Library of Law and Liberty

For More go to the Home Page >>>

Join Our Email List



section

Bookshelf

FreeMarket Central

Some titles recent, all recommended -

Special Video Feature

FreeMarket Central

Voices From The 2017 International Students For Liberty Conference

section

In Search Of History

The Reagan Tax Cuts Worked

Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).

 

-- Daniel J. Mitchell,

Shadow Stats Snapshot


FreeMarket Central

ShadowStats alternate economic indicators are based on the methodology of noted economist John Williams, specialist in government economic reporting.

  • Unemployment:
    FreeMarket Central BLS: 4.07%
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 21.7%
  • Inflation:
    FreeMarket Central March Year-to-Year: 2.21% (CPI-U*)
    FreeMarket Central Shadow Stats: 9.9%

*[cpi-u is the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation rate for all urban consumers]

section